23-09-2014, 01:43 PM
Gordon Gray Wrote:How about this? Connolly was shot more than once? There were 5 wounds.
Only one story can be correct:
1. If only the US government's evidence and reports are considered, it is clear a lone gunman fired three shots from the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) killing JFK and wounding two other men.
2. If the acoustical evidence analysis AND credible witness' observations are considered by themselves, then it is clear that a conspiracy killed JFK. And it wasn't just a conspiracy, it was a powerful conspiracy from high in the US government that had the power to forge evidence and harass witnesses to enable the press and the public to accept the story in #1.
CONSIDERING:
If (1) is correct, you would only need to consider a handful of documents to reach a reasonable conclusion that LHO fired three shots and killed JFK. The Warren Report and Bugliosi's RECLAIMING HISTORY coupled with the integrity of the US government, for example; indicate this story is correct and everything else is based on misunderstandings, lies, over zealous conspiracy theorists and plain nuts who jump on the bandwagon when a conspiracy is considered.
If (2) is correct, there would be other information that the US government could not control nor forge. For example, the acoustical analysis indicates that the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG, two shots fired a split second apart. Is there information that supports this scenario?
1. A sizeable population should have heard two separate shots for the last shot like sounds heard. This internet blog suggests that between a statistically significant population of the witnesses in Dealey Plaza heard BANG-BANG, two shots fired a split second apart exactly like the acoustical evidence shows happened.
Richard Charmon's blog http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014...een-shots/ and references suggest over 20 witnesses (or is the correct answer 44?) said the last two sounds indicate that the last two shots were fired a split second apart. Many just say BAM-BAM or BANG-BANG.
2. The first of those last two shots was fired from the right front of JFK. It hit JFK in the head just forward of the right ear (in the hairline) according to a credible witness' Warren Commission testimony. Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman went on to say he saw a massive wound in the right rear of JFK's head that was approximately five inches in diameter. This description of the exit wound in the right rear of JFK's head matches what medical personnel at Parkland say they saw.
Dr McClellan's drawing is consistent with what other medical people at Parkland say they saw when the back of JFK's head was viewed.
Nurse Pat Hutton's description of a massive wound in the rear of JFK's head sat classified TOP SECRET for decades in sealed storage until released. It was written soon after the assassination and was in storage for decades. Hutton was not influenced or pressured to say what she said she saw. WHY WOULD THE US government classify Hutton's comments TOP SECRET? If you read the whole page, you will see the only thing sensitive that might be representative of GRAVE DANGER to the security of the United States is the description of the massive opening in the right rear of JFK's head. Therefore, it wasn't danger to the security of the US, it was dangerous if this information became public to the conspirators in the US government who ordered JFK's murder.http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/memori...l-0?page=0
The last shot of the double BANG was fired 0.7 seconds after JFK was shot in the head. IF you look at a computer stablized version of the Z film, you will see JFK knocked violently back to his right rear. 0.7 seconds after Z313, a bullet fired from the TSBD looks like it missed JFK's head and hit Gov. Connally in the back which bent him over forward EXACTLY like he said happened in almost every description he ever gave about the shooting.
When is Gov. Connally bent over? He told you and the Z film shows it (if and only if you look at the computer stabilized version of the Z film, the early Z film versions have a massive blur which obscures the radical movement of Connally when he is thrown forward when the bullet hit him in the back):
John Connally made TWO radical movements exactly when the acoustical evidence indicate shots were fired:
4.8 seconds BEFORE the fatal head shot
0.7 seconds AFTER the fatal head shot
[video]http://s17.photobucket.com/user/Cortex_2005/media/zapruder.gif.html?o=37[/video]
Connally's movement from the stablilized Z film immediately after JFK's head shot when the acoustical evidence indicates the last shot was fired from the TSBD.
WHY would anyone think Connally was shot with five separate bullets? His two radical movements made when the acoustical evidence indicates shots were fired paint a unique picture which is much stronger when taking the two sources of information together. I know this doesn't pass most people's smell test for reasonableness but it is one of the reasons the public has been tricked for decades.
Bill Charleston
All these years have gone by and it never occurred to me that Connally was shot after JFK's fatal head shot. Once you're walked through it, it's immediately evident that that's exactly what happened. It all fits! It's the ONLY thing that fit's. It's amazing work. You're the VERY first person to put this all together. Congrats!! Watching your video was like putting glasses on correctly after wearing them backwards for years without realizing it. A surprised viewer
All these years have gone by and it never occurred to me that Connally was shot after JFK's fatal head shot. Once you're walked through it, it's immediately evident that that's exactly what happened. It all fits! It's the ONLY thing that fit's. It's amazing work. You're the VERY first person to put this all together. Congrats!! Watching your video was like putting glasses on correctly after wearing them backwards for years without realizing it. A surprised viewer