24-09-2014, 10:34 PM
R.K. Locke Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there.
Thou shalt not take the Evica-Drago Model lightly.
Do you have any substantive criticisms of the model?
I am not interested in whatever personal enmity may exist between yourself and Charles Drago but I am curious to know how you would set about delineating the various levels/dimensions of the plot without recourse to a model that is at least similarto the aforementioned.
Just wondering.
I have found the worst way of researching the JFK assassination is to become a devotee of someone else's model. I research the evidence and draw my own conclusions.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964