27-09-2014, 05:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-09-2014, 06:54 PM by Drew Phipps.)
So your answers are:
1. None.
2. The second shot thru the trees from the TSBD fragmented, a fragment didn't touch anything or anyone else in the car, somehow described a curved path from the rear right to the front left, around Connally's torso, and embedded itself in his left inner thigh halfway between the knee and the hip.
You have a member of a "powerful conspiracy" firing at least twice blindly thru trees. You've substituted a "magic bullet fragment" for the original "magic bullet", simply for the reason that your theory needs that particular shot to damage Connally's thigh. You have ignored the evidence that the dictabelt recording wasn't a recording of the actual assassination. You have ignored the fact that no one has ever claimed that the "sound impulses" on the dictabelt were the actual sounds of the shots. You have ignored Connally's eyewitness evidence. You rely upon Zapruder's film, an understandable but increasingly questionable source.
My verdict: Guilty as charged.
Keep working on your theory, you've done great work on the eyewitnesses, but keep in mind that proof of a powerful conspiracy involved in the cover up isn't quite the same thing as proof of a conspiracy to kill.
1. None.
2. The second shot thru the trees from the TSBD fragmented, a fragment didn't touch anything or anyone else in the car, somehow described a curved path from the rear right to the front left, around Connally's torso, and embedded itself in his left inner thigh halfway between the knee and the hip.
You have a member of a "powerful conspiracy" firing at least twice blindly thru trees. You've substituted a "magic bullet fragment" for the original "magic bullet", simply for the reason that your theory needs that particular shot to damage Connally's thigh. You have ignored the evidence that the dictabelt recording wasn't a recording of the actual assassination. You have ignored the fact that no one has ever claimed that the "sound impulses" on the dictabelt were the actual sounds of the shots. You have ignored Connally's eyewitness evidence. You rely upon Zapruder's film, an understandable but increasingly questionable source.
My verdict: Guilty as charged.
Keep working on your theory, you've done great work on the eyewitnesses, but keep in mind that proof of a powerful conspiracy involved in the cover up isn't quite the same thing as proof of a conspiracy to kill.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."