Can't find diagram of shots to jfk from conspiracy point of view?

[William Charleston]

So your answers are:

1. None.

2. The second shot thru the trees from the TSBD fragmented, a fragment didn't touch anything or anyone else in the car, somehow described a curved path from the rear right to the front left, around Connally's torso, and embedded itself in his left inner thigh halfway between the knee and the hip.

You have a member of a "powerful conspiracy" firing at least twice blindly thru trees. You've substituted a "magic bullet fragment" for the original "magic bullet", simply for the reason that your theory needs that particular shot to damage Connally's thigh. You have ignored the evidence that the dictabelt recording wasn't a recording of the actual assassination. You have ignored the fact that no one has ever claimed that the "sound impulses" on the dictabelt were the actual sounds of the shots. You have ignored Connally's eyewitness evidence. You rely upon Zapruder's film, an understandable but increasingly questionable source.

My verdict: Guilty as charged.

Keep working on your theory, you've done great work on the eyewitnesses, but keep in mind that proof of a powerful conspiracy involved in the cover up isn't quite the same thing as proof of a conspiracy to kill.

1. I never said none. With shot #2 being fired NOT from the TSBD and NOT from the grassy knoll, isn't it "STRANGE" that shot #2 showed 3 microphone locations from the TSBD and one from the GN? In other words, the acoustical experts took a shot that theoretically should not have passed their criteria and they showed 4 microphone matches with a p > 0.5. The HSCA acoustical analysis contains major mistakes but that doesn't mean it doesn't contain the sounds of the shots. 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds in both the Zapruder film and the acoustical analysis proves it did capture the sounds of the shots (by sounds, I mean the echo impulse pattern sound signature of a shot).

Prof Barger was trying to take the acoustical analysis to the next level with crap for data. Yes, it looked like shot like echo patterns but no, it was not good enough to determine the location of the shooter nor the motorcycle.



If the second shooting experiment would have been conducted, then you would know to within a few feet where the motorcycle microphone was for each of the five shots. The gubermint goons couldn't let that happen and they didn't, the HSCA ran out of money. The only shot carefully analyzed by the HSCA was shot #4, the shot from the GN.

If you read the HSCA handwaving, you'll see that they used "scientific facts" to rule out the grassy knoll shot even though Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman described in his WC testimony a small hole about the end of his little finger in the hairline forward of JFK's right ear (entrance wound) and a massive wound about 5 inches across in the right rear of JFK's head (which matches numerous witnesses' descriptions of the wound in the back of JFK's head). For the conspiracy to succeed, the US government had to discredit and ignore the witnesses. In many cases, they just ignored credible witnesses and substituted lies.
--------------------------
http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/sel...rt-1b.html

Since the medical, ballistics and neutron activation analysis evidence, taken together, established that the President was struck by two bullets fired from Oswald's rifle found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, the committee sought to determine if such shots could have struck the President, given the known position of his body, even the grassy knoll shot struck him at Zapruder frame 312. The results correlating the acoustical tape to the film, assuming the shot from the knoll was at Zapruder frame 312, are as follows:(107)

[TABLE="class: layout, width: 80%"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]Zapruder frame[/TD]
[TD]Acoustical determination of origin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Impulse pattern I[/TD]
[TD]173-177[/TD]
[TD]TSBD.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Impulse pattern II[/TD]
[TD]205-208[/TD]
[TD]TSBD.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Impulse pattern III[/TD]
[TD]312[/TD]
[TD]Grassy knoll.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Impulse pattern IV[/TD]
[TD]328-329[/TD]
[TD]TSBD.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


It was determined by medical, ballistics and neutron activation evidence that the President was struck in the head by a bullet fired from a rifle found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. For that bullet to have destroyed the medical evidence of the President being hit at Zapruder frame 312, it would have had to have struck at Zapruder frame 328-329. But a preliminary trajectory analysis, based on the President's location and body position at frame 328-329 failed to track to a shooter in the sixth floor southeast corner window of the depository within a minimum margin of error radius,(108)thus indicating it was highly unlikely the President was struck in the head at Zapruder frame 328 by a shot fired from the sixth floor southeast corner window of the depository. Further, there is no visual evidence in the Zapruder film of the President being struck in the head at Zapruder frames 173-177 or 205-208, the frames at which shots one and two would have been fired if the shot from the knoll was a hit to the head at frame 312. Accordingly, if the shot from the grassy knoll occurred at frame 312, no shot fired from the Texas School Book Depository would have struck the President in the head at any time. Such a finding is contrary to the weight of the scientific evidence. The committee concluded, therefore, that the shot fired from the grassy knoll was not the shot visually represented at Zapruder frame 312: that the shot from the grassy knoll missed President Kennedy;[SUP]17[/SUP] and that the most accurate synchronization of the tape and the film would be one based on a correlation of impulse pattern four on the tape with the fatal head shot to the President at frame 319 of the Zapruder film. When the tape and film are so synchronized, the sequence on the film corroborated or substantiated the timing of the shots indicated on the 1963 tape.

According to the more logical synchronization, the first shot would have occurred at approximately Zapruder frame 160. This would also

[SUP]17[/SUP]The committee noted there was no physical evidence of where a shot from the grassy knoll might have hit. Since a shot from the Texas School Book Depository hit the President in the head less than one second after the shot from the knoll, there would have been little apparent reason for a gunman on the knoll to fire a second shot.
----------------------------------

The logic in the HSCA assumes the government evidence is correct. The acoustical evidence PROVES the US government forged and lied, you will probably never be able to comprehend that is true. That's OK, the US government has fooled millions for decades, this lie is not going to die overnight.

2. The original thread title was there was no diagram of a conspiracy scenario. A few trajectories along with wounds each of the bullets needs to be presented to answer the title.

There were three bullet fragments found inches away from Gov Connally. I can't prove Connally's leg was turned toward Nellie Connally except by noting that he had a wound in his left thigh from a bullet fragment, not a bullet. To fool Americans, the US government had to convince people that all of Connally's wounds were caused by one bullet. Connally had two of the quickest reactions in the Zapruder film exactly when the acoustical recording indicates shots were fired (4.8 seconds before and 0.7 seconds after JFK was shot in the head).

You've also noted the Z film and the acoustical evidence have flaws. YOU CAN'T blindly accept data from each one but taken together, a unique shooting scenario exists.



[TABLE="width: 601"]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]AUTHOR:[/TD]
[TD]Abraham Lincoln (180965)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]QUOTATION:[/TD]
[TD]You may fool all the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all the time; but you can't fool all of the people all the time.

It makes little difference what you and I think, it only matters what the evidence the US government did not and could not have forged shows. And that story proves conspiracy and massive amounts of forged evidence.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]