Tracy Riddle Wrote:Over at Amazon, I stumbled across a book released last year that I hadn't heard of - Phantom Shot by Mike Majerus. It supports the official story, except that it proposes there were only two shots fired. The third was a car backfire or something. Of course it's nonsense, but has anyone else read it?Why waste time on this non-sense.
I used to try and read all of the lone-nutter books back in the 1990s, but I finally stopped because they were so repetitively stupid and numbingly deceptive.
There were over 129 witnesses that claimed to have heard three or more shots.
This includes 19 sheriff deputies guarding the front steps of their station house located just outside of DP, all heard three rifle shots.
A Person who would propose a phantom shot does not understand all of the evidence available or has failed to put it in context and only concentrate on the few claims of having heard 'firecracker' or 'noise' or 'backfire' which alternately each claim can be provided with more logical and reasonable explanations than reverting to a phantom shot.
As ridiculous as it now is three shots can't explain all of the wounds, two shots certainly does not help to make the scenario any more evident.