Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How Credible is the Markham Tape?
#3
David Josephs Wrote:I found this link to a page where MaBell lists the "Officially recommended Exchange names" http://ourwebhome.com/TENP/Recommended.html
It does NOT show MAtthew as an exchange anywhere... but that does not mean it was not used by operators.

I found another site that allows you to search Exchanges: http://rcrowe.brinkster.net/tensearch.aspx

There are TX phone numbers that begin with MA so I do not know that you can say definitively that Markham was not reached at a phone in Texas.
Plus she finally admits that is is indeed her on the tape...

Since there were no area codes at this time it is impossible to tell which state MA (62) would be as all states could have a MA (62) starting number.
A long distance call had to be accomplished with an operator as the transcirpts show http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/w..._0296a.htm

Seems to me that MAyfield or MArket could easily reach Mrs Markham in TX somewhere... I have no idea what MAtthew might be.



[TABLE]
[TR="bgcolor: #507cd1"]
[TH]Numbers Dialed
[/TH]
[TH]Letters Dialed
[/TH]
[TH]EXchange Name
[/TH]
[TH]City
[/TH]
[TH]State
[/TH]
[TH]Country
[/TH]
[TH]More info
[/TH]
[TH]Contributed By
[/TH]
[TH][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MArket
[/TD]
[TD]Barksdale
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MArket
[/TD]
[TD]Buena Vista
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MArket
[/TD]
[TD]Fort Worth
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]Normalize location
[/TD]
[TD]Hugh Hamiton <hamilton
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MArket
[/TD]
[TD]Ft.Worth
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nlambert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MArket
[/TD]
[TD]Indian Creek
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MArket
[/TD]
[TD]Palo Alto
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAyfair
[/TD]
[TD]Dallas
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]Normalize prefix
[/TD]
[TD]Hugh Hamilton <hamilton
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAyfair
[/TD]
[TD]Jarratt
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAyfair
[/TD]
[TD]Oak Island
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAyfair
[/TD]
[TD]Sandy Hills
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAyfair
[/TD]
[TD]Thelma
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MA (?)
[/TD]
[TD]Decatur
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MA (?)
[/TD]
[TD]Somerset
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAdison
[/TD]
[TD]Houston
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection.48 IVanhoe at Cincinnati OH needs to be deleted. This name didn't exist there.
[/TD]
[TD]nlambert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAdison
[/TD]
[TD]New Braunfels
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nlambert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAdison
[/TD]
[TD]Sandy Creek
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAdison
[/TD]
[TD]Windom
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAin
[/TD]
[TD]Deadwood
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAin
[/TD]
[TD]Eastland
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]nLAmbert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAin
[/TD]
[TD]El Paso
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]Old directories
[/TD]
[TD]Hugh Hamilton <hamilto
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAin .
[/TD]
[TD]Dallas
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]1918 directory. Manual prefix
[/TD]
[TD]Hugh Hamilton <hugh.hamilton
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAdison
[/TD]
[TD]Bellaire
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection. Houston exchange.
[/TD]
[TD]n lambert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: #eff3fb"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAin
[/TD]
[TD]Darrouzett
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]from my collection
[/TD]
[TD]n lambert
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="bgcolor: white"]
[TD]62
[/TD]
[TD]MA
[/TD]
[TD]MAdison
[/TD]
[TD]Houston
[/TD]
[TD]TX
[/TD]
[TD]USA
[/TD]
[TD]Found on old company letterhead along with MOhawk. Address was 11525 S. Main, Houston 25, Texas.
[/TD]
[TD]T. Holmes
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

The tape shows that Mark Lane called a long distance number. This means that the phone company would have kept a record of the calling number, the called number and duration of the call. This practice would have enabled the FBI to determine the name and address of the called party at MA 7-6797 provided that call actually took place.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
How Credible is the Markham Tape? - by Herbert Blenner - 26-11-2014, 03:20 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 2,175 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Warning! Please do not listen to this tape if you don't want to hear the truth! Scott Kaiser 0 2,070 22-07-2015, 05:38 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Monroe sex tape to be auctioned......sorry for the 'Enquirer-type' news. Peter Lemkin 7 6,022 05-03-2014, 02:49 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Fetzer Deemed "Not Credible" by Morley and Bradford; Accused of Spreading "Misinformation" and "Disi Charles Drago 33 13,683 05-01-2013, 09:32 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago
  Clifton tape and Collins Radio Doug Horne Bernice Moore 92 24,263 20-03-2012, 07:22 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  us archives releases longer a/f one tape recorded after JFK ssassination.. Bernice Moore 3 3,675 03-02-2012, 04:25 AM
Last Post: Bill Kelly
  New tape: JFK fretted moon program was tough sell Bernice Moore 4 4,111 17-06-2011, 05:52 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  The Space Review; Analizing the new Kennedy Tape.. Bernice Moore 0 2,155 31-05-2011, 10:38 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)