Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon?
#4
I haven't got 2 hours set aside to watch that video today.

However, I note that whatever is happening to the steel beams happens all ay once along their entire length. I would suppose that you would see a freefall collapse in the event those beams were supporting a building, not a progressive collapse.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - by Drew Phipps - 26-11-2014, 03:39 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The KEY to unlocking the 'official lie' of 9-11-01 is there was TOO MUCH ENERGY INVOLVED! Peter Lemkin 28 26,828 06-10-2013, 06:41 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Pentagon's non-lethal weapon projects leaked - including a laser beam that 'steers enemy planes' Ed Jewett 0 3,091 06-01-2012, 11:54 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)