Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon?

[Peter Lemkin]

I'm still trying to get my head around the question where did the rubble go. The twin towers amounted to, I understand, 1.2 million tons. They were they world largest office blocks with what, 50,000/60,000 office workers based there? That's 50/60,000 desks, telephone, computer stations, thousand of boardroom tables, kitchen equipment etc - not counting the vast array of steel struts that were the bones of both buildings. One fireman who survived the collapse asks the question. He said (it's in the above clip) where were the desks and phones? He was completely bemused that there were none that he could see as he made his way out of the remains.

Can anyone explain this?

It defies explanation using the 'official' bullshit model! ONLY with a HUGE additional energy source other than the pitifully small fires from the planes and gravitational energy, can one explain any of the observed phenomenon. Explosives, such as nanothermite/ate and/or beamed weaponry (or other exotics) could have supplied the extra needed energy - pancaking can NOT - not even come close! A person who worked for months on the rubble pile said the largest piece of anything from an office found was a one-and-a-half inch wide piece of a desk phone. Only one small piece of the hundreds of thousands of steel file cabinets was found - as I remember it had been melted almost beyond recognition but with some paper hanging folders unburned......ah, but some of the hijacker's passports and headbands were found intact...not to worry!:tampfeet::

Dr. Wood's website with many interesting photos - often not covered by other 911 researchers is here http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/

None [!] of the photos below [and the phenomenon they capture] can be explained by the 'official mythology' of how things happened on 911 - and I chose only a few of thousands].



fused steel and cement.