30-11-2014, 08:49 PM
If the footage of the steel beam evaporating is genuine then I would assume the hypothetical energy weapon would have to have been directly above or (less likely) below. If it had been utilized from another trajectory then its effects would have been noticeable on other surrounding structures. Plus, if we are to assume that the damage to WTC6 was the result of an energy weapon of some kind, then again the beam must have come from directly above.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
― Leo Tolstoy,