01-12-2014, 03:59 PM
For a bullet travelling from a highly elevated shooting position, entering JFK's back below the shoulder line and exiting above the shoulder line, it would necessarily have to change course inside the body, implying that it hit something, or that a great deal of its rotational inertia had been converted from spin to yaw (which implies a rather larger loss of velocity than is allowed by the SBT). If you put the back shooter in a less elevated position the physics of the bullet's alleged flight path thru JFK's body is a lot less problematic.
How the bullet then resumes a downward course to strike Connally is another matter.
How the bullet then resumes a downward course to strike Connally is another matter.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."