08-01-2015, 02:11 PM
Was your question designed to elicit answers about a conspiracy to cover up the facts, or was it about a conspiracy to kill the President? Have to be careful about this, because there might be people who participated in a conspiracy to cover up the facts with good and even noble motives (I'm thinking Earl Warren specifically). If you want proof that the fix was in, there's a recording of 1963 LBJ's telephone call to Warren shanghai'ing him into the cover up, and Hoover's 1963 letter to LBJ in agreement with the need for a cover up.
You can guess, from the proof of an "after" conspiracy, the existence of a "before" conspiracy; but guessing isn't very convincing, and probably won't lead you toward the real bad guys.
You can guess, from the proof of an "after" conspiracy, the existence of a "before" conspiracy; but guessing isn't very convincing, and probably won't lead you toward the real bad guys.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."