08-01-2015, 08:59 PM
David Josephs Wrote:Herbert Blenner Wrote:Michael Cross Wrote:I've been in some discussions arguments on the various JFK Facbook pages and I've noticed our community's tendency to get lost in the minutia.
Jim DiEugenio has made many great arguments at ctka, but they are complex for the average attention span of a modern human being.
So, what is your simple argument?
Mine would be that Ford moved JFK's back wound to make the SBT work. Therefore it doesn't work, hence conspiracy.
Humes misplaced his 7 mm by 4 mm back wound at the location of the 7 mm by 10 mm wound discussed by the medical panels. Ford only took credit for this misplacement.
I truly do not want to get into an argument over this Herbert, but as I showed in my grphic above and as this shows, where Ford moved the hole was from the BACK to the NECK. There was no hole where he repositioned the entrance wound while his positioning negates the offered fraudulent path of this missle.
The back and neck wounds do not connect. Ford, as a servent of the FBI did what he was asked to do to "clarify history"
Peace
DJ
Your arrows do not point to the 7 mm by 4 mm wound described by Humes with its longer axis nearly parallel to the long axis of the body. Instead your lower arrow points to the 7 mm by 10 mm wound whose longer axis was almost perpendicular to the same long axis of the body.