12 Dead in Daytime Paris Attack at Satirical Magazine

[Peter Lemkin]

Two thoughts

1. Any event where ISIS or Al Qaeda claim responsibility is like a stamp of approval that western intelligence agencies are involved in one way or another.

2. If you are someone that takes your religion so seriously as to kill somebody else, then why would you kill two fellow Muslims? Can you imagine the punishment in the hereafter for doing such a thing? It makes absolutely no sense and also makes me question the fact again that these guys were even Muslims and not some kind of programmed assassins.

While both 'organizations' seem to have been born out of a gleam of Western Intelligence eyes [and funded/trained at some points in time], I don't think everything they do now are under Western Intel command. The second group now has also split into factions - some at each other's throats. We often build Frankensteins that then act on their own.

As to the other point, only one would have been known to be at the target location - and possibly 'justified' as working for the blasphemers if not one himself. The other was a policeman who arrived just as they did....unlikely they could know who might - and unlikely if they even had known he was Muslim, they'd change their mind for one in a police uniform.

Those points said, the report of blue eyes for one, and several other unexplained or contradictory bits of information, so far, do leave open some question as to exactly who did that shooting, and who sent them to do it. Programmed assassins are known, as are patsy assassins, and false-flag assassins who let patsies take the 'flack'. I think it is too early to really tell....but I'm watching and questioning. This has very much changed the tenor in France and all over Europe - much as 911 did in the USA, if at a slightly lesser level of trauma. It all certainly bears close analysis and challenges to the official version.