24-01-2015, 06:21 PM
Or you could go that way with it... ::rockon::
Nicely done Herbert. Mine is just a simpler observation - both based on some common sense.
Foreknowledge of the 133-C pose coupled with your post suggests... ??
Ya think Roscoe created the images using a stand-in during the time it was not exactly proven the Oswald's lived at Neely...?
Or were they taken later in the year since setting Ozzie up in March 63 means the thought of a Phase 1 contingency begins very early.
It has been my experience though, that evidence was created as it was needed in late Nov (thru today) to tell the story that needed telling.
Paine supposedly sees a BYP fri nite, right?
Stovall and Rose must actually bring the evidence with them on Saturday to the Paines. And only one negative means no authentic comparisons.
====
Now, Johnnie Grizzaffi, a friend of Studebacker, is used in ref to the lost negative... why?
Nicely done Herbert. Mine is just a simpler observation - both based on some common sense.
Foreknowledge of the 133-C pose coupled with your post suggests... ??
Ya think Roscoe created the images using a stand-in during the time it was not exactly proven the Oswald's lived at Neely...?
Or were they taken later in the year since setting Ozzie up in March 63 means the thought of a Phase 1 contingency begins very early.
It has been my experience though, that evidence was created as it was needed in late Nov (thru today) to tell the story that needed telling.
Paine supposedly sees a BYP fri nite, right?
Stovall and Rose must actually bring the evidence with them on Saturday to the Paines. And only one negative means no authentic comparisons.
====
Now, Johnnie Grizzaffi, a friend of Studebacker, is used in ref to the lost negative... why?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter