Definite proof the BYPs were faked - and who is Johnnie GRIZZAFFI and what did he say?

[Herbert Blenner]

Which "convention" Herbert...

I see no dates related to these OTHER photos... please help me understand.

Are you too dense to understand a counting sequence?

Evidence #46 was labeled before Evidence # 48 through Evidence # 68. These higher numbered items were sent to the FBI within days of the assassination.

So the DPD have the subject photo, Evidence #46, in their possession within days of the assassination.

There's the sweet man I used to read here... ::


Herbert, are you of the opinion that the evidence and records of this assassination, especially of the FBI and DPD, is worth the ink they're written with?

You have a photocopy of an image which was not seen as a 1st gen image until 1977...
When were these images digitized HB?
Are you claiming that a numbering convention is PROOF that a photo was placed in a file at a certain time?

In Mexico City the FBI said that OSWALD entered and left Mexico because the stamp of a man who worked during the time Ozzie supposedly crossed the border has his stamp on yet another document, the Tourist Visa.

A stamp on a piece of paper, none of which can be authenticated or corroborated. In fact the man whose name it is states to the FBI that OIswald arrived in a car with 2 women and a male driver... Mr. Maydon (Mexican INS who stamped the visa) .

From my study of the Mexico Trip's and the FBI's creation of evidence, then changing their minds when THAT evidence doesn;'t work to NEW evidence... and even THAT offeres no corrorobation or authentication.

But hey, if a few numbers on a piece of paper is good enough for you... so be it.

Get to the heart of it HB... With only 2 poses in evidence and one negative, the DPD produces an image and a cutout of this 133-C pose which is not made aware to anyone and then we come to find that White and Stoval have prints of said pose and image.

I'm not sure what you are trying to prove...?? that this picture existed and Marina took it with the other two? That it did not come out as good as the others so it was hidden away?
What is your point exactly related to when this image came into being and who knew about before 1977...

The Photograph Panel proved that the DPD had the negative of CE-133A from which they made the enlargement known as CE-134. So in reality the DPD had the three negatives from which CE-133A, CE-133B and 133-C were printed or enlarged.

I suggest the readers study the following link.

http://hdblenner.com/gradual.htm