09-02-2015, 07:35 PM
Tracy Riddle Wrote:I think we should be able to debate and discuss matters here without questioning each others' integrity and motives.The terms "high" and "low" are very vague and relative. I'm the first to admit I don't know whether JFK was really struck in the back, or exactly where, or by what.
A "high" back wound would be at the base of the neck -- the "low" back wound was at T3.
A 2+" difference.
Nothing could be easier than assessing the location of the back wound. The US Gov't, the Corporate media, and a small army of privater citizens have blown so much smoke over the issue it's been effectively obfuscated.
The bullet hole in JFK's shirt is 4" below the bottom of the collar.
Tracy, glance down upon your right shoulder-line, then casually raise your right hand and wave a la JFK.
You will observe the fabric of your shirt indent. Indentation is the opposite of what high back wound defenders claim occurred with JFK's shirt.
This is a universal phenomenon which occurs literally hundreds of billions of times a day on this planet.
Anyone can verify this.
A five year old could demonstrate the location of the back wound.