13-02-2015, 06:19 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:I read the entire Bugliosi chapter on the brain evidence and it is nothing but an exercise in getting around the real evidence. If you take all the conspiracy advocates' brain evidence and assemble it into a case you can see it fits perfectly into the dishonest donut hole Bugliosi left in his so-called treatment that would supposedly answer all conspiracy claims the way conspiracy advocates wanted them answered. To the contrary, if you assemble all the (real) brain evidence under the assumption of a deliberate act of sabotaging of the evidence in order to cover-up a conspiracy it also fits perfectly.
Von Pein runs from the brain evidence like a vampire runs from daylight. He says there's no evidence but his actions speak louder than words. (Bugliosi's too)
One big problem with the brain evidence.
It doesn't exist, for all intents and purposes. The brain is not in evidence.
JFK is not going to be dug up.
A lot of the head wound/s evidence is contradictory.
We don't know how many times he was shot in the head; we don't know if pre-autopsy surgery was conducted.
It's the grand rabbit hole of the JFK case.
I think we need to ask ourselves: Is this the kind of evidence that is going to draw younger people into the case?
Polls show millennials ain't so into it.