13-02-2015, 06:52 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Cliff Varnell Wrote:One big problem with the brain evidence.
It doesn't exist, for all intents and purposes. The brain is not in evidence.
JFK is not going to be dug up.
A lot of the head wound/s evidence is contradictory.
We don't know how many times he was shot in the head; we don't know if pre-autopsy surgery was conducted.
It's the grand rabbit hole of the JFK case.
I think we need to ask ourselves: Is this the kind of evidence that is going to draw younger people into the case?
Polls show millennials ain't so into it.
If you had a better understanding of the brain evidence you would know it doesn't have to be in formal evidence.
What does "have to be" mean?
In order to interest younger people in the case the evidence needs to be far more clear-cut than a missing brain.
The government trapped itself in its fatal conflicts involving that evidence that any jury like Mark Lane's Miami jury would see right away.
I'm not talking about a jury. I'm talking about the young'uns and their inclination to wade through any convoluted evidence.
At some point Kennedy will be dug up.
...Wow...gotcher cyrstal ball working just fine I see.
It's not a rabbit hole and will offer better evidence than the shirt forensics. But it will also help those same shirt forensics as well.
Cliff, don't undermine other advocates' attempts in order to promote your shirt evidence.
Undermine?
I think the obsession with the head wound/s has been undermining JFK research for decades.
You think the Kennedy family would ever give permission for such a thing?
1