14-02-2015, 03:38 AM
As I noted in Reclaiming Parkland, which I don't think Cliff has read, one of the bombshells of the ARRB was that Stringer not only denied that he took the photos of the brain, he said he never used that process or that type of film.
I had my fair share of criticisms of Horne's book, but that was one of the gems in it, (along with his elucidation of how the x rays were forged.)
In RP, I then went through all the witnesses--I think its was 13-- who testified that a large part of the brain was missing, anywhere from about 1/3 to almost 1/2.
To any objective person, this is why the photos had to be retaken. And no shooting victim could survive that kind of brain damage. So its not about the cover up.
Finally, the reason we have less young people entering the case is not because we all don't advocate this low back wound idea. My God any student of the case is aware of it because its in many books.
The reason is simple: the other side controls the media. The lying Gary Mack, Gus Russo etc.
And when we do get in there its with the fruitcakes, like those who were on with the Files presentation, of which Pat Speer told me, "Jim, these guys made Fetzer look reasonable."
The brain evidence is very powerful and simple to present. If we ever got a show where we could use two voice over actors doing the transcript of Stringer's testimony, and have Jeremy Gunn there to set it up, and then quote the list of witnesses who say the brain was extremely damaged in volume, that would be electric if you ask me.
(Now, Cliff, go ahead and do your regular red mark, in chunks of this, to try and show how its all wrong.)
I had my fair share of criticisms of Horne's book, but that was one of the gems in it, (along with his elucidation of how the x rays were forged.)
In RP, I then went through all the witnesses--I think its was 13-- who testified that a large part of the brain was missing, anywhere from about 1/3 to almost 1/2.
To any objective person, this is why the photos had to be retaken. And no shooting victim could survive that kind of brain damage. So its not about the cover up.
Finally, the reason we have less young people entering the case is not because we all don't advocate this low back wound idea. My God any student of the case is aware of it because its in many books.
The reason is simple: the other side controls the media. The lying Gary Mack, Gus Russo etc.
And when we do get in there its with the fruitcakes, like those who were on with the Files presentation, of which Pat Speer told me, "Jim, these guys made Fetzer look reasonable."
The brain evidence is very powerful and simple to present. If we ever got a show where we could use two voice over actors doing the transcript of Stringer's testimony, and have Jeremy Gunn there to set it up, and then quote the list of witnesses who say the brain was extremely damaged in volume, that would be electric if you ask me.
(Now, Cliff, go ahead and do your regular red mark, in chunks of this, to try and show how its all wrong.)