14-02-2015, 10:43 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:As I noted in Reclaiming Parkland, which I don't think Cliff has read, one of the bombshells of the ARRB was that Stringer not only denied that he took the photos of the brain, he said he never used that process or that type of film.
An even bigger bombshell: Saundra Kay Spencer denying she processed the extant autopsy photos, even though she's on record as having done so.
This sleight of hand with the photos belongs in a study of the cover-up.
I had my fair share of criticisms of Horne's book, but that was one of the gems in it, (along with his elucidation of how the x rays were forged.)
A study of forged x-rays is a study of the cover-up.
In RP, I then went through all the witnesses--I think its was 13-- who testified that a large part of the brain was missing, anywhere from about 1/3 to almost 1/2.
Did this 1/3 to 1/2 of the brain go missing in Dealey Plaza as the result of a military-style ambush -- or did it go missing at Bethesda as the result of a medical ambush?
The brain is 100% missing. This goes to the cover-up.
To any objective person, this is why the photos had to be retaken. And no shooting victim could survive that kind of brain damage. So its not about the cover up.
Re-taken photos, deep-sixed photos, faked photos, missing brain, multiple violations of autopsy protocol.
This is a study of the cover-up.
Finally, the reason we have less young people entering the case is not because we all don't advocate this low back wound idea.
The lack of JFK Critical Community consensus over the prima facie evidence of conspiracy -- the T3 back wound, throat entrance -- has allowed the Vince Bugs and Johnny Macs of the world to wave the T1 back wound flag and blow pixie dust over the most crucial evidence in the case.
My God any student of the case is aware of it because its in many books.
For every Vincent Salandria, Gaeton Fonzi, David Lifton, Jim Marrs or Noel Twyman (all of whom acknowledge the low back wound) we have Tink Thompson, Cyril Wecht, Pat Speer, Stu Wexler or John Hunt waving the T1 back wound flag blowing pixie dust over the most crucial evidence in the case.
The reason is simple: the other side controls the media. The lying Gary Mack, Gus Russo etc.
The other side has always controlled the media.
Millennials have the internet.
And when they go online to look into the JFK assassination what do they encounter?
A bunch of Boomers bickering over bullshit like the head wound/s or the acoustic evidence or the goddamn windshield.
And when we do get in there its with the fruitcakes, like those who were on with the Files presentation, of which Pat Speer told me, "Jim, these guys made Fetzer look reasonable."
The brain evidence is very powerful and simple to present.
And yet you can't answer the most basic questions: how many head shots, was there pre-autopsy surgery to the head?
If we ever got a show where we could use two voice over actors doing the transcript of Stringer's testimony, and have Jeremy Gunn there to set it up, and then quote the list of witnesses who say the brain was extremely damaged in volume, that would be electric if you ask me.
An electric inquiry into the cover-up of the medical evidence.
(Now, Cliff, go ahead and do your regular red mark, in chunks of this, to try and show how its all wrong.)
[B]Does the head wound/s evidence help identify potential Persons of Interest in the actual murder?
No.
Does the T3 back wound/throat entrance help identify potential Persons of Interest?
Yes.
The Staff Support Group within the US Army Special Operations Division at Ft. Detrick.
/