15-02-2015, 10:27 PM
CV: This one is all on you, Jim.
Oh really?
In your reply to me about Colby, you mentioned you vs. DVP on the back wound.
Your defense of Colby then got eviscerated at reply 64 and 65--which is at least on topic since Colby is in the title.
It was Albert who then brought up the brain evidence at 67.
At 68, I replied on McAdams and I told Albert I agreed about the brain evidence.
At 69 I then commented on MCAdams, Colby and drew a comparison to Morley--on topic.
Albert brought up Bugliosi's treatment of the brain at 71.
This is where the thread went awry again. For from 72 to 80, it was back and forth on the brain stuff between you and Albert. That is nine straight comments which I had no part in.
Please Cliff.
Oh really?
In your reply to me about Colby, you mentioned you vs. DVP on the back wound.
Your defense of Colby then got eviscerated at reply 64 and 65--which is at least on topic since Colby is in the title.
It was Albert who then brought up the brain evidence at 67.
At 68, I replied on McAdams and I told Albert I agreed about the brain evidence.
At 69 I then commented on MCAdams, Colby and drew a comparison to Morley--on topic.
Albert brought up Bugliosi's treatment of the brain at 71.
This is where the thread went awry again. For from 72 to 80, it was back and forth on the brain stuff between you and Albert. That is nine straight comments which I had no part in.
Please Cliff.