19-02-2015, 05:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-02-2015, 09:22 PM by Albert Doyle.)
I think it is actionable and they should be sued for it. They offer a plea for public input and then practice methods that would be considered violations of public conduct in any other case.
The failed ex-porno film-maker Jimmy Wales then asks for donations on top of it!
Here's an excerpt from the Michael Jeffery "Talk" page:
The first editor calls the murder claim unprovable. Not true. This kind of one-line doubt is all Wikipedia needs to establish the anti-murder bias and norm.
GabeMc is a regular. He calls the murder evidence "nonsense" and once again establishes the phony rules-skewed censorship of information that supports that oppressive view. I'm sure if you investigated GabeMc he would be of the same type as the Cuban posting in favor of McAdams.
Of course it would be a shame if a man who single-handedly represents a symbol of government murder and cover-up was known for his single-most important act. Gee, the next thing you know is people will be ganging-up on Judas and defaming him.
.
The failed ex-porno film-maker Jimmy Wales then asks for donations on top of it!
Here's an excerpt from the Michael Jeffery "Talk" page:
Quote:WP:UNDUE[edit]
It'd be a shame if the unproven and unprovable murder allegation overwhelmed this article. I recognise that BLP is not a factor here but WP:NPOV definitely is. --John (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I came across this article yesterday having GA reviewed Canadian drug charges and trial of Jimi Hendrix and remarked that while getting articles to GA and FA is great, sometimes it might be preferable to have a better average quality of articles on a topic, and cited this and Chas Chandler as examples. I'm sure the regular Hendrix editors can whip this into shape - I personally don't have any decent sources to hand. Ritchie333 [SUP](talk)[/SUP] [SUP](cont)[/SUP] 09:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Jeffrey was an elusive figure that the reliable Hendrix sources don't say much about. Its my understanding that there are only a few pictures of him and that most of his life is shrouded in mystery if not myth. Based on the little that I do know about him, I seriously doubt that this article could be expanded to GA level, but the nonsense about his having murdered Hendrix is at best a matter for WP:FRINGE. GabeMc [SUP](talk|contribs)[/SUP] 19:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)I wasn't thinking of even going that far - just C class would do for now. Ritchie333 [SUP](talk)[/SUP] [SUP](cont)[/SUP] 07:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
The first editor calls the murder claim unprovable. Not true. This kind of one-line doubt is all Wikipedia needs to establish the anti-murder bias and norm.
GabeMc is a regular. He calls the murder evidence "nonsense" and once again establishes the phony rules-skewed censorship of information that supports that oppressive view. I'm sure if you investigated GabeMc he would be of the same type as the Cuban posting in favor of McAdams.
Of course it would be a shame if a man who single-handedly represents a symbol of government murder and cover-up was known for his single-most important act. Gee, the next thing you know is people will be ganging-up on Judas and defaming him.
.