28-02-2015, 08:15 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:The media here are all playing this one for al it's worth. And, naturally, the implication is that Putin is responsible. It's not stated as bare arsed as that but makes use of all that indirect crap. Such arseholes our media today.
But it tells me that the Anglo-Americans are out to get Putin come what may, and if it takes a year to train up Ukrainian forces and rearm them, then that's what it'll take - and then round 2 will begin.
It seems to me to that it may all come down to timing. Will Russia and China be able to have their new alternative to western banking and economy up and functioning, and can Putin ensure that a US inspired "colour revolution" doesn't take place to regime change him, because this is what Uncle and his poodle have planned.
And I find it interesting that Merkel and Hollande are keeping quiet through all this.
It's amusing to see the media become engaged in a "conspiracy theory" when it suits the Anglo-American agenda.
Most opinion pieces or articles on websites like the Guardian are usually started with the caveat "I usually have no time for conspiracy theories" or such...
All of a sudden "conspiracy's" are all the rage and it's "obvious" that evil Putin dun it.
::face.palm::