11-04-2015, 06:01 AM
R.K. Locke Wrote:Yes, both Russ and Daniel have some very good stuff on their web sites. Put the MSM to shame.Dawn Meredith Wrote:R.K. Locke Wrote:Russ Baker's take:
http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/04/07/why-we-...h-the-pen/
Plenty of other good Boston-related stuff on his site. Seems like the "defence" was an absolute disgrace, as we all expected.
I was hoping for something way more in depth on this travesty. Russ barely scratched the surface in this piece.
Dawn
There is lots of good stuff on his site. That piece is just a brief response to the verdict. It's also worth checking out Daniel Hopsicker's site as he has done some good work on this case too.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.