15-04-2015, 09:11 PM
David Josephs Wrote:
That's a question that you will never get answered Bob. Never. Three times he mentions his affidavit during his testimony and three times they ignore it and move on. Baker's testimony is from March 20th while Truly was the next week.... BELIN was most certainly aware of Baker's affidavit yet lets Truly do his little dance:
What can't be argued is what the physical evidence offered says... the affidavit and the obvious conflict with the entire lunchroom scene. I know I sound like a broken record but if Armstrong is right, it may have been Lee coming down the stairs and Harvey in the lunchroom... yet then we get the story from Mrs Reid about Oswald in only a T-shirt - so it would have to be LEE who leaves that way.
If I could respond to what was addressed to Bob - this is what I'm trying to say, is the pressure about seeing two Oswald's would create the need to leave one out and fit the pattern of conflicts in the evidence. They are aware there is a problem and working around it. Truly was the Potemkin minder. If you were going to omit one Oswald it would be the one that was further away.
It fits doesn't it?
And don't forget Carolyn Arnold places Oswald in the lunchroom at 12:25 - making it more likely he was there the whole time.