17-04-2015, 06:20 PM
David Josephs Wrote:
And yes... Somehow Baker is convinced to support the lunchroom story...
It is possible Baker omitted this encounter originally because of the same overall corruption at the Dallas Police Station that subverted the interrogation notes. It is possible Dallas PD knew Oswald was a spook and delayed certain information. There's reason for them to know Oswald was spooky from prior encounters years earlier but also from the Carousel. The lunchroom encounter being omitted could have more reasons behind it than it simply never having happened. The statement above assumes the encounter never happened but that might not be so. The evidence does have a witness who put Oswald in the lunchroom near to 12:25 according to Golz. It could be possible that after seeing a double on the 4th floor landing Baker was convinced to omit the lunchroom encounter as being the furthest away from the 6th floor. The reason the 4th floor subject was not identified is because his identification would be problematic. Craig did see one Oswald exit in a different direction.