19-04-2015, 06:58 AM
From what I read, that was not the case with Carpenter. Its a book Clay Shaw would have authorized.
Roy/Blatburst or whatever his name is, will be just as bad if not worse. When a writer posts a review on Max Holland's site, that says it all. I mean that is where McAdams trashed the Douglass book.
I asked Roy/Blackburst if he thought Oswald did it, and I did so more than once. He never answered.
Now he has. No honest, objective, intelligent person can believe that today. Not with all the evidence of the ARRB.
And because he would not answer the question, and now he has, I am even more convinced his book will be agenda driven from the first page, like Carpenter's.
Its hard to comprehend, but the cover up now continues, after 51 years.
Roy/Blatburst or whatever his name is, will be just as bad if not worse. When a writer posts a review on Max Holland's site, that says it all. I mean that is where McAdams trashed the Douglass book.
I asked Roy/Blackburst if he thought Oswald did it, and I did so more than once. He never answered.
Now he has. No honest, objective, intelligent person can believe that today. Not with all the evidence of the ARRB.
And because he would not answer the question, and now he has, I am even more convinced his book will be agenda driven from the first page, like Carpenter's.
Its hard to comprehend, but the cover up now continues, after 51 years.