02-05-2015, 07:56 PM
Those aren't high quality enough.
See Groden had it on 16 mm film projected onto an auditorium screen.
He also had it in what he calls Groden scope, which means he slows it down, stabilizes it and at times can crop it so your eye is at a certain place.
It was, as I said, really compelling. But see, he was not the first onto this point. It was really Ray Marcus in the sixties who detected that head buckle before JFK goes behind the sign.
But anyway, my main point is that all of this "careful research" and pointing out the critics as "mythologists" is leading Roy/Blatburst to one major point: the WC was right. There was no conspiracy.
This is where he is going of course. And its obvious after he posted on the rabid "Oswald did it" Max Holland's site. See if you can call certain people in the critical community mythologists , and yet post on a guy who, beforehand, knew he was creating a fraud on a TV special, then who are you?
I have been around the bend in this community, so I can see the earmarks.
See Groden had it on 16 mm film projected onto an auditorium screen.
He also had it in what he calls Groden scope, which means he slows it down, stabilizes it and at times can crop it so your eye is at a certain place.
It was, as I said, really compelling. But see, he was not the first onto this point. It was really Ray Marcus in the sixties who detected that head buckle before JFK goes behind the sign.
But anyway, my main point is that all of this "careful research" and pointing out the critics as "mythologists" is leading Roy/Blatburst to one major point: the WC was right. There was no conspiracy.
This is where he is going of course. And its obvious after he posted on the rabid "Oswald did it" Max Holland's site. See if you can call certain people in the critical community mythologists , and yet post on a guy who, beforehand, knew he was creating a fraud on a TV special, then who are you?
I have been around the bend in this community, so I can see the earmarks.