05-06-2015, 04:42 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Hi Bill
I agree entirely with the passage below by Peter Dale Scott:
Quote:11/22 and 9/11 as Engineered Provocation-Deception Plots
Other factors however have persuaded me to link the twin deceptions of 11/22 (the JFK assassination) and 9/11. One is the common modus operandi I have come to see as underlying the details of both events. Two years ago I listed fifteen striking similarities in my reissued book The War Conspiracy. I listed another half dozen in an earlier draft of today�s talk, but there will not be time today to share them.5.
More important than the similarities is the continuity I have described in my recent books, in the evolution of what I have come to call the American War Machine. By the American War Machine do not mean the American public state, or even what is often referred to as the national security state. I mean a coalition of forces both inside and outside government, extending to elements of the American media and universities, which is distinct from the public state; and has continuously systematically pressured the public state into more and more ambitious designs for global dominance. 6.
I see both 11/22 and 9/11 as more complex than the simple false-flag deception events employed in the 1930s by the Japanese Army and by Hitler, because in both cases a prior sequence of falsified documentary records was elaborately contrived. Drawing on the language of actual Joint Chiefs documents, I describe such a contrivances (with respect to 9/11) as an �engineered deception event,� and would now call an �engineered (or fabricated) provocation-deception plot.� The words �engineered� and �fabricated� are taken from a Joint Chiefs of Staff document of May 1963, JCS 2304/189, which is the starting point for my talk today. Here is the thesis of that document: �The engineering of a series of provocations to justify military intervention is feasible and could be accomplished with the resources available� 7.
Like the Northwoods project of a year earlier, the May 1963 document JCS 2304/189, devised by J-5 of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was not thinking hypothetically. As a series of false-flag �FABRICATED PROVOCATIONS,� it suggested
Fabricated provocations could be evolved by a carefully timed combination of some of the following typical incidents:
(1) Arranging a series of well coordinated incidents to take place in and around Guantanamo to give a realistic appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces to establish a credible attack against the US Naval Base....
(2) Using MIG type aircraft flown by US pilots to harass civil air, attack surface shipping or to attack US military�.
(5) Make it appear that Castro was lending direct support to insurgent communist elements in a Latin American country such as Haiti or Guatemala. 8.
The provocation-deception events being fabricated in this period by the Joint Chiefs went far beyond the standard deception tactics engaged in by both the CIA and armed forces � as when the Allies in World War Two managed to deceive Germany as to the location of the D-Day invasion. The proposed target of these engineered deceptions was clearly not Cuba, but the American people, to accept the unilateral initiation by America of an illegal war. I shall refer to these deceptions targeted against Americans as not just engineered provocation-deception events, but as provocation-deception plots. In them the recurring aim is to persuade the American people, falsely, that they have been subjected to an enemy attack.
The brazen JCS proposal in 1963 to deceive the America people in order to provoke a war is not a unique aberration in American history. The Iraq War was also clearly preceded by a deep event�a false-flag lethal operation against innocent civilians in the United States. I am referring to the 2001 anthrax mailings, which were later identified as involving anthrax from a source inside the U.S. biowar establishment. But at the time, there were numerous pre-invasion stories such as this one in the Daily Mail by Simon Reeve:
Quote:Iraq has been identified as the most likely source of the anthrax used to terrorise
America during recent weeks. New plans are now being considered for retaliatory military strikes against Saddam Hussein, according to American government officials. Although studies of the anthrax spores sent through the mail are continuing, American scientists have discovered �hallmarks� that point to Iraqi involvement. American investigators are increasingly convinced that the anthrax was smuggled into the US and mailed to a number of targets by unidentified �sleeper� supporters of Osama Bin Laden�s Al Qaeda organisation.9.
(Later Bush, in his State of the Union address to Congress leading up to the Iraq war, would make the distorted charge, later disproven, that Iraq had �materials sufficient to produce over 25,000 liters of anthrax.�) 10. Much later, referring to Fort Detrick, Salon reporter Glenn Greenwald pointed out that �the same Government lab where the anthrax attacks themselves came from was the same place where the false reports originated that blamed those attacks on Iraq.� 11.
I will use my Mod powers to merge the other thread into this one.
Quote:Ngo dinh Diem and his brother Nhu had been assassinated in a coup on November 1, 1963, three weeks before Kennedy�s assassination in Dallas.
The Diem brothers assassination was known to the White House before it happened, Kennedy signed off on their assassination regretting doing so before having a round table sit down, because Kennedy signed off on it, the CIA acted quickly, and the assassination took place.
As qucikly as the CIA took out the Diem brothers, taking out Kennedy was a breeze.