Anyone want to discuss HARVEY & LEE?

[David Josephs]

What Bart here wont tell you is how badly he and the others have been put in their collective places...

We post evidence, they post opinions...

Couple main points:

The whole tonsil regrowth thing... did some research and come to find that only 6% of children with partial tonsillectomies had regrowth and that was within an average of 30 months after the average age of 5.... 6% is the hook these boys and girls hang their hats on to suggest that the USMC medical records can reflect tonsil problems with Oswald who had his removed as a child yet when in the Russian hospital his tonsils were normal sized... hmmm ???

Strike two is Parker's repeated assertion that Odio was never introduced to "Oswald", that these men only used the name Leon... really quite sad actually since the evidence is overwhelming that they introduced the American as Leon Oswald to Sylvia, twice... and she never wavered from that story.

Strike three is actually very simply since Dawn posted the records. From March 23, 1953 to Sept 14, 1953 the FBI produced records which counted every single potential school day to reach their attendance figure.. including the 55 days of summer. Parker makes the argument that this is correct in spite of the fact Oswald did not attend summer school.

The following is the FBI's attempt to explain their fraudulent records.... rather than say it was 125+ days from March to the end of a semester - which is not possible, they extend the date until the start of the next semester since their total is the sum of the record's 109 +15 + 62 + 3 + half days... and forgets the 40 days of school from Jan 16 to March 23 when school is in session yet Oswald does not attend ANY school...

Bart would have you believe these are difficult to reconcile concepts... he insults an author and researcher and expects no one to respond to the attack...
Take a look around... Google Mr. Kamp here and expose yourself to the full extent of his research and writing efforts... when you stop laughing we can continue....

In fact
Has anyone seen anything posted by an H&L naysayer that actually proved they were right about something - EVER?

So Bart... instead of insults and accusations how about posting a real rebuttal to ANY point in H&L... time to put up or shut up already - from what I've seen of your "work" the last thing we need is another wannabe Parker trolling for minions to slap his back and kiss his ....

So address this Bart... show us the chops you claim to have in debunking the evidence... fit 200 days of attendance into 123 days of school...

why can't any of you ROKC parrots count?

(the other thing they need to believe is that the USMC did not weigh or measure of take vitals of discharged marines, they supposedly just asked and wrote down whatever the Marine said... the 5'11" discharge height was a guess according to the minions... THAT is the level of stupidity with which we have to deal when discussing the height difference from 20 to 24...

{sigh} What is actually the greatest of all is that these 5 or 6 people spend an enormous # of hours with H&L... while asking why WE spend time defending it... All that effort and so little result... the same 6 people who didn't like H&L still don't... while those who want to look further, do. Which in the end was the entire point of it in the first place...

So let's see what Bart here can do with some simple math... or does he need Parker here so he has something to nod his head in agreement to... polly want a cracker? ::puppet::