14-06-2015, 10:25 PM
What's wrong with the lapel flip idea is that the implication is that this is when the bullet hit JBC, and its an extension of the bullet that hit JFK.
Those are both wrong, because when you see JBC's jacket the bullet hole is not near the lapel.
Therefore, if the lapel is flipping, and there is a debate about that also, it was probably because Connally was turning to the crowd and perhaps the wind caught the lapel.
Can you imagine wasting 17 pages arguing over Lattimer? Even Ron Ecker congratulated Crazy Dave for accomplishing his mission; which is to distract and waste time. All the while building up grist for his web site. Now that his book has bombed.
That is what the EF has come to.
Those are both wrong, because when you see JBC's jacket the bullet hole is not near the lapel.
Therefore, if the lapel is flipping, and there is a debate about that also, it was probably because Connally was turning to the crowd and perhaps the wind caught the lapel.
Can you imagine wasting 17 pages arguing over Lattimer? Even Ron Ecker congratulated Crazy Dave for accomplishing his mission; which is to distract and waste time. All the while building up grist for his web site. Now that his book has bombed.
That is what the EF has come to.