17-06-2015, 02:30 PM
More Von Pein craziness.
He now says that the Edgewood arsenal reports by Olivier etc prove that the rifle could do the damage to JFK.
Do you believe this guy?
First of all, there is the question of whether or not Oswald ever ordered or picked up that rifle, a problem the WC ignored completely.
Second, how does a rifle bullet make a large, gaping, avulsive wound in the back of the skull from behind?
Third, as Gary Aguilar always quotes, when these tests were run, every time they tried to duplicate this wounding in the skull, they blew out the front of the skull's face. Which, according to the autopsy pics, did not happen in this case. (Are the pics phony then?) For the proof, see Gary's essay in Murder in Dealey Plaza, p. 184. He actually pictures the photos of the blasted out skulls, which, by the way are in the WC, CE 861 and 862. Somehow, Davey Boy missed those. Great researcher isn't he?
What a joke. But that is Spartacus today.
He now says that the Edgewood arsenal reports by Olivier etc prove that the rifle could do the damage to JFK.
Do you believe this guy?
First of all, there is the question of whether or not Oswald ever ordered or picked up that rifle, a problem the WC ignored completely.
Second, how does a rifle bullet make a large, gaping, avulsive wound in the back of the skull from behind?
Third, as Gary Aguilar always quotes, when these tests were run, every time they tried to duplicate this wounding in the skull, they blew out the front of the skull's face. Which, according to the autopsy pics, did not happen in this case. (Are the pics phony then?) For the proof, see Gary's essay in Murder in Dealey Plaza, p. 184. He actually pictures the photos of the blasted out skulls, which, by the way are in the WC, CE 861 and 862. Somehow, Davey Boy missed those. Great researcher isn't he?
What a joke. But that is Spartacus today.