The Fiasco of Spartacus

[Albert Doyle]

Why should John waste his time arguing with Parker?

You're right. Anyone who tries to get away with saying Oswald's driver's license was an application is a pathetic troll. And any room that doesn't call him on it isn't credible.


I realize from Parker's response that it is a mistake to feed a denial troll any opportunity to practice his deceit. Armstrong obviously isn't giving the dignity of attention to a pathetic troll. Driver's application - sheesh. The reason Parker isn't credible is because while accusing others of not entertaining other options he ignores that the Oswald dopplergangers seen driving around in cars would need a driver's license. This is why David Josephs pretty much beat him in debate and why the EF deniers have to resort to polls to overcome it. Parker's obviously desperate for attention for his blowhard bully skepticism which equals Lone Nuttery. Last post on this since Parker's drivers application bs and the lack of anyone calling him on it should be enough to convince serious researchers to not take him seriously. There's no way the professionals at the Texas Safety & Highway Dept who were trained to identify those things would miss the difference. Both Armstrong and Josephs are quite safe from this creep.


FYI: I didn't open his sycophant troll link.


.