The Fiasco of Spartacus

[Vanessa Loney]

Trolls who are dodging the substance shouldn't be allowed to lead the conversation. If you can't answer this you really don't have anything to say. You're dragging a wagon with no wheels:




What I don't get is why some very intelligent people don't realize Greg Parker is a bombastic nut with goofy arguments who is now ready to be blown over with a puff of breath after trying to honestly suggest that the 6 Texas Public Safety & Highway Department employees who clearly saw the Texas Driver's License with Oswald's name on it were all crazy Armstrong looney's who needed a brave skeptic, Greg Parker, to come in decades later and correct them and tell them what they saw with his obviously nutty contrivances. Why do they let him get away with that??? Greg protests "Balderdash!" but then proceeds to not really make any attempt to answer the question. After he is done with his huff and puff and bluster you realize he made no attempt to answer that Bogard had a firm memory of going out of town on the 9th and rushed his test drive because of it. Most researchers would heed this and fear challenging its obvious veracity, but, no, not Greg Parker who has a Fetzer-like relationship with reality and will bloviate his way around it. Always winning, by means of the cheap trick of skepticism - a intellectual form that requires much less valid input to practice than Armstrong's brave investigation - no matter how badly he is obviously losing on facts and arguments. A form wedged by cheap ROKC abuse and trolling. Parker tries to get away with ignoring that out in the Kennedy assassination universe there are Oswald's driving cars into garages, driving all around Alice, Texas with prop wives, and driving away from TF White in a panic. Being a credible researcher Armstrong responsibly went out and tried to account for these obvious eccentric Oswalds. Parker, who employs a less honest and cheaper approach, noticeably stays away from these Oswald's because he knows they threaten his agenda. He shares a common methodology with Vincent Bugliosi. So what Greg needs to come clean with is exactly where the border between those driving Oswald's and his crank theory lies? In the end the pathetic thing about Greg Parker is once you apply his own standard to him he fails it much worse than Armstrong, once you deny him his bully bullshit.


Vanessa: What is your point? That you don't mind that Greg is lying about the Driver's License?

Hello Brian

My point is threefold. 1. This thread is for the discussion of the 'fiasco' of EF not for GP's theories on H&L;
2. if you want to discuss GP's theories on anything why don't you go over to EF and discuss it with him there?; and
3. the best way to resolve this sniping between sites on the JA and GP debate is for them to have a proper debate on BOR.

And really, can you keep your insults consistent because I'm having trouble following what you are accusing me of. I don't know whether I'm Arthur or Martha on here.