21-06-2015, 09:50 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Ms. Loney, Reading your posts [and the thread on the 'other forum' in which a group egged you on to promote certain agendas here on this Forum], I find that you have not come to enlighten with information regarding any Deep Political events or any political, historical, social, or cultural events at all...but to provoke on two themes, thus far. Provocation for the sake of provocation is not valid under the rules of engagement here. If you care to remain, keep it civil and to points of subject matter based on informed study, information, or facts. Personally, I find the agenda of trying to discredit Armstrong's work when you freely admit you have not read it and don't even plan to is ludicrous. I imagine all those who put you up to this on the 'other Forum' are following it with glee...but be warned....this could soon come to an abrupt end if it doesn't get into substantive issues on historical, political or deep political matters. Cross-Forum trolling always creates problems and ill will. From reading the thread on the Forum you more often frequent, neither you nor the other posters seem to think much of this Forum and refer to it in deprecating terms....so one wonders exactly what you motive[s] are here, now.
Mr Lemkin,
I'm sorry but I'm at a loss here. I have never criticised DP so I'd appreciate it if you could point out where I have. Otherwise you are accusing me of guilt by association and we all know how legitimate that is.
I've only commented on two threads here; one of which is an attack on the EF and the other which appears to be an attack on me. These are fundamentally matters of personal opinion. I don't see any Deep Political factual events raised in either thread which I could rebut with counter-facts.
In the absence of a debate between JA and GP on H&L then I suggest the best way to progress the H&L discussion is for Mr Di E to go on EF and discuss H&L over there rather than talking about it with others over here. Don Jeffries has invited him to do so.
As far as I'm aware I've not said anything particularly disparaging about JA's theory because I am doing my level best to avoid discussing that theory at all! I really don't have anything to contribute to it. But I think those that do, should, together, on EF.
As I've mentioned before, I came on here to address the criticisms of EF, ROKC and myself and to propose a debate between JA and GP.
By all means, ban me if you wish but I really don't believe the basis for any such banning exists.
If I was on one of the factual threads and refusing to discuss the substance of that thread then I could see the point of your argument. But I am only commenting on threads which are based on personal opinion and involve personal attacks on me and my colleagues at ROKC and EF.
Once again, no-one has put me up to anything. I'm very much my own woman. But it's illustrative that you all should think that. I also believe I've been civil - if I haven't please point it out to me and I'll apologise.