Local university NSW aviation expert Peter Marosszeky said in an interview this morning that it was probably not from a Boeing and therefore not from that missing flight. Something about Boeing parts being painted grey and this is part has white paint on it. Could be bleached though. Apparently it is not the only missing large plane in the area. It could belong to them. He also said that it is likely a government is withholding information of the event.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Magda Hassan Wrote:Local university NSW aviation expert Peter Marosszeky said in an interview this morning that it was probably not from a Boeing and therefore not from that missing flight. Something about Boeing parts being painted grey and this is part has white paint on it. Could be bleached though. Apparently it is not the only missing large plane in the area. It could belong to them. He also said that it is likely a government is withholding information of the event.
After I posted this update, I thought, "This is bullshit." Somehow, "they" planted the parts. Just sayin'.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
30-07-2015, 05:22 AM (This post was last modified: 30-07-2015, 05:38 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
If it is from that plane, it might be possible to soon determine or not. If not, then it is likely from another large plane that crashed. If it is [and they will admit it is...a big IF], then one has to look at wind and water circulation patterns to try to figure out about where it came from [which will be a large area, given all the time to move about]. Even though most planes parts are aluminum, they don't float in water unless they have a sealed air space - so strange it floated in. All very strange, and brings at least heading for Diego Garcia back into the picture, IMHO. That it could be a plant must also be considered, but most plants can be discovered with a little work as fakes [not from that specific plane]. Would be difficult, but not impossible, to fake part ID numbers. Many plane parts, but not all, have unique numbers that are recorded by the manufacturer and airline when the part is built or is replaced during maintenance. I'm not an expert by any means, but it seems a small part of the wing to by chance have a uniquely numbered part. What type of plane will be the easiest part...which exact plane a bit more difficult unless there is a unique part number and they tell the truth about that number.
I find the coincidence of this turning up today, on the same day the Security Council was voting on doing an investigation or not [not due to Russian veto] on the other Malaysian crash, 'interesting'. What are the chances of that?!
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
I have kind of a problem with the idea that this wing washed ashore at the location in those photos. It's not a beach. The water looks smooth as a mirror. There are lines of stones over which the wing would have had to travel to arrive at this spot. It's in the grass. Grass doesn't typically grow where it would get regularly tidally soaked by seawater.
Also, I heard this yesterday on the CNN news, which you might not hear again: A talking head aviation expert says the visible damage on this part doesn't indicate a high speed collision event, but more like a "flaps-extended" (lower speed) attempt to land, as this part apparently was ripped from the plane prior to the main wing striking the water.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
But no way has it been in the oceans for more than a year. Unless they found it very soon after but that makes no sense re the currents and travel time.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Drew Phipps Wrote:I have kind of a problem with the idea that this wing washed ashore at the location in those photos. It's not a beach. The water looks smooth as a mirror. There are lines of stones over which the wing would have had to travel to arrive at this spot. It's in the grass. Grass doesn't typically grow where it would get regularly tidally soaked by seawater.
I saw video footage of some men carrying it from a beach to another location inland, so I don't think that it is being claimed to have landed from the sea onto that grass. Much is not yet known, such as who found it and its chain of custody has clearly been less than formal. It does have mussels growing on it, clearly visible. However, I was thinking, if one wanted to confuse everyone as to the real location of the craft's disappearance, what better than to get a real production part, put it in the sea for a year and then make it appear somewhere other than where the plane went down. As for the suitcase, how could that have stayed afloat unless it was one of the super strong, supper-watertight kind that are used for electronics and photography equipment? It all could be...but it also could be many other things than what it is being purported to be.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
06-08-2015, 07:41 AM (This post was last modified: 06-08-2015, 07:57 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
There is no conclusive proof [so far] that this came from that particular plane, but they are treating it is if it has been confirmed. If there was no 'salting' of evidence, then it is likely, as I believe no other 777 went down or missing in the Indian Ocean area....if some salting of 'evidence' had been done, then the game is still wide open.....
The media, with almost no exceptions (except some skeptical independent bloggers) and the Malaysians, however, have certainly overstated the positiveness of a 'match'. I'll believe it is a 777 part; but I'm not yet convinced it is from that particular plane. Had the disappearance of the plane not been so mysterious, I might not be so skeptical.
Quote:According to the French prosecutor in Paris, the investigators' conclusion remains only a "very strong presumption" based on Boeing's confirmation that it was a 777, and "specific technical characteristics" communicated by the Malaysian Airlines engineers in Kuala Lumpur. No definitive serial numbers have been immediately found on the part, but it could potentially mean that some part of the maintenance regime over its years of service have left an identifying mark - but if this is the case, it has not been so stated.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Here the news is quoting the Malaysian PM as saying it is confirmed from the MH370 plane. But then the French have only ever confirmed that "there was a very high probability" that it was from the same plane. Not really a confirmation. And it really shouldn't be this difficult to say yes it is or no it isn't.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
