Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The 9/11 Cover Up
#1
Nothing particularly new here but it's a well-collated and interesting set of clips. Richard Clarke in particular delivers a bravura performance...

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.”
― Leo Tolstoy,
Reply
#2
Having watched this video, I am not quite sure what Richard Clarke said "they got away with." Did they get away with incompetence? Did they get away with being unable to to handle inter-agency squabbling? What does he think they got away with? Or is he as vague as usual?
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Reply
#3
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Having watched this video, I am not quite sure what Richard Clarke said "they got away with." Did they get away with incompetence? Did they get away with being unable to to handle inter-agency squabbling? What does he think they got away with? Or is he as vague as usual?

Ya this is just another limited hangout. Let it happen on purpose at best. Same old same old. Had the info but did not share.
Reply
#4
It seem apparent that this sort of disclosure and the "public outrage" accompanying it would be used to justify "easier" (read: "warrantless") law enforcement access to the wealth of data at the NSA. Legally (and now that the program is public knowledge, politically), you have a choice: You can either put the illegally acquired information in the hands of "local" law enforcement, making them more effective at stopping the bad guys (but less likely to obtain court convictions); or you can let them struggle along without it, making them far more likely to secure convictions in the work that they complete. The third option is to provide local law enforcement with the illegally obtained information and instruct them to perjure themselves about its' origin. Guess which option we're using now? Seems unlikely that this third option will survive public disclosure.

I expect that there will be a fair bit of debate about it in the 2014 and 2016 campaign cycles. Please make your position known to your representatives if the topic arises.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The murder of Sgt. Yeakey to cover-up the OKC Bombing [911-rehearsal] Peter Lemkin 0 4,045 10-02-2017, 07:06 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The role [and cover-up] of Saudi Arabia, before, during and after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 Peter Lemkin 11 14,244 12-12-2013, 09:13 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Ten years on, details of 9/11 cover-up released Bernice Moore 1 2,477 11-09-2011, 06:46 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Did 9/11 provide cover for massive securities fraud by the Fed? Ed Jewett 1 2,637 17-06-2010, 03:47 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Jack Abramoff released from prison early ... for his part in the 9/11 cover up? Ed Jewett 2 3,158 10-06-2010, 07:09 AM
Last Post: Carsten Wiethoff
  "The Reason For This Cover-Up Goes Right To The White House" Ed Jewett 1 3,341 19-03-2010, 01:07 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Lies, Damn Lies and Cover-Ups Ed Jewett 0 3,422 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Ryan Dawson's "911 and the Cover-Up" Ed Jewett 0 2,788 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  The ASCE Journals have now been shown to be complicit in the 911 cover-up Tony Szamboti 0 2,903 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Two new articles - Hopsicker and Hicks on Jeb Bush and the 9/11 cover-up Anthony Thorne 0 16,063 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)