Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tony Szamboti on NIST
#1
from 911Blogger (Some of the comments are worth reading.)

Quote:Below is a series of twenty five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross should be investigated.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Great New 911 Film - NIST insider speaks out about the obvious lies. Peter Lemkin 0 4,683 14-03-2017, 07:25 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  NIST overlooked NSA's cryptography 'back door' Peter Lemkin 0 3,223 28-11-2014, 08:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Tony Szamboti's 25 Points of Contention with NIST Lauren Johnson 0 3,600 08-11-2014, 06:36 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  More BS: an alternative to the NIST fairytale Martin White 4 7,097 04-11-2014, 10:13 AM
Last Post: Martin White
  Prelude To A Lawsuit Against NIST?! Peter Lemkin 4 4,804 04-03-2014, 03:01 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  9/11 Free Fall 1/16/14: Tony Szamboti and Gerry B. Lauren Johnson 4 4,684 26-01-2014, 04:40 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 4,089 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The Eleventh Day by Tony Summers and Robbyn Swan Bill Kelly 14 12,018 24-08-2011, 01:07 PM
Last Post: James Lewis
  Int'l Center for 9/11 Studies - NIST Cumulus Video Database Released Ed Jewett 10 7,611 09-11-2010, 09:54 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  NIST photos and videos released Ed Jewett 2 4,302 02-09-2010, 08:55 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)