Quote:Leonid Kalashnikov, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, said that Russia does not need to "bow and scrape" before MEPs. "Send them to investigate the murder of Kennedy," - he said, pointing to the fact that Russia is not under the jurisdiction of the European Parliament, and that the resolution adopted by the legislative body is a direct interference in the investigation. "We have to say once clearly that we have someone to investigate, we have a sovereign country. We live by our own laws, "- said the politician.
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
March 12, 2015
Anna Veligzhanina for Komsomolskaya Pravda
Translated by Kristina Rus
Quote:FSB source to "Komsomolskaya Pravda": "the customer of Nemtsov's murder was preparing an assassination of Vladimir Putin"
The main suspect in the organization of the high-profile crime - is a commander of the Ukrainian battalion in the name of Dzhokhar Dudayev, Adam Osmayev.
The correspondent of "Komsomolskaya Pravda" met with the FSB agent, who is part of the team investigating the murder of Boris Nemtsov. In an exclusive interview he spoke about the new details of the crime and named the most likely customer of the murder.
The pistol was found
Today the investigators have irrefutable proof that all persons detained on suspicion of murder of the politician are the perpetrators, - said our source in the FSB. First of all, billing (data about calls and movements of the subscriber. - Ed.) from their mobile phones showed that they conducted surveillance of Nemtsov before the murder, following him closely. The suspects were tracked with their phones at the location where Nemtsov was present with his phone. During the murder all the detainees "were in the area": some under the bridge, some in a car, some nearby.
Zaur Dadaev pulled the trigger. He first made a confession, and then, on the advice of his lawyers, took it back. But it changes nothing, the investigation has already collected compelling evidence of his guilt. I will not give details of how this was done. The pistol was thrown into the river after the crime, it was later recovered by divers. That Zaur Dadaev immediately said to the TV cameras: "I love prophet Muhammad" - is just a cover. There was no religious motive for the killings. They cynically carried out an order. They are far from devout Muslims. In fact, just real gangsters.
And the most important thing. The executor of the murder was in close contact with Adam Osmaev, who recently became the commander of the Ukrainian battalion in the name of Dzhokhar Dudayev. They met, talked a lot on the phone. Zaur Dadaev and his cronies worked with Osmaev on Ukrainian affairs. And also with Chechens, who fought on the territory of Ukraine for the new regime. Zaur Dadaev was listed in the battalion "North" ("Sever") of the Chechen Interior Ministry, but while serving in it, in fact, was engaged in activities against Russia. He was associated with Osmaev by a certain relationship and mutual obligations.
When the journalists from the Russian TV channel "Life News" were recovered from Ukraine, Zaur Dadaev was involved in this operation. Held direct communication with Osmaev. I don't have the right to disclose the details. The evidence is still being gathered. But I can say that today the main suspected customer of Nemtsov's murder is Adam Osmayev.
"The main purpose of the crime is to show Russia in a bad light"
- The perpetrators were told to execute the order in the place where it was committed, - continues our source. - Another words not just to kill him in the alley, but do it in the heart of Moscow across from the Kremlin - deliberately to cause outrage around the world. Before the crime they received the advance payment, it was agreed that the remainder of the money for the "job" will be transferred to their bank account.
- Why did they have to kill Nemtsov, who spoke out against Putin's policies? It turns out, they had killed their ideological ally!
- [Ultra-] Nationalists and criminals will not stop at anything. To kill their ally for them is not a question of morality. Nemtsov became a bargaining chip. The goal was - to slander Russia, to show it in a bad light, to prevent peace in Donbass (especially after talks with Merkel and Hollande). To show the President of Russia in the eyes of the world community as the "ultimate evil" - to show: look, how he strangled the opposition. The world just began to warm up to Putin's politics, which he is following in relation to Ukraine. And this cynical murder of Nemtsov has caused a wave of discontent, fueled by the world media. The American and European press immediately began to show this murder in their own light, placing the responsibility on the President of Russia.
Preparing to blow up the President's motorcade
Adam Osmayev was previously suspected in the attempt to organize the 2012 assassination of Vladimir Putin, at that time a Prime Minister and presidential candidate. Osmayev planned to blow up Putin's motorcade, which was confirmed by a video, found in his laptop, of Prime Minister's motorcade travelling through Moscow. Then Osmaev cooperated with the investigation - admitted he came to Odessa from the United Arab Emirates with instructions from field commander Doku Umarov. But in court Osmayev refused to testify, claiming he gave his testimony after a beating. His lawyers wrote a complaint to the Prosecutor's office and the European Court of Human Rights.
- Osmaev failed to get to Putin himself, but it seems that he did not calm down, - says our source in the FSB. - And later the most accessible target to attack the President was selected - Boris Nemtsov. Nemtsov lately was not seen as an active member of the opposition, was no competition to Putin, but his name was known. The choice of a sacrificial lamb was quite successful. The gangsters do not stop at anything. And gangsters involved in politics is a devilish blend.
- Will Osmaev be charged?
- Now everything is in the stage of investigation and evidence collection. Some of the evidence we already gathered, but I don't want to tell everything in order not to hinder the investigation.
"KP" Files
What was Adam Osmayev "famous" for...
In 2007 in Moscow on the eve of Victory Day a terrorist attack was averted - explosives were found in a parked car. A native of Grozny, Adam Osmayev, a suspect in the case, was arrested in absentia by the Lefortovsky district court of Moscow and declared for international search. The investigation found that Osmayev with a group of Chechens and Ingush was also preparing an assassination on May 9 of the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov.
According to the press, after that Osmayev was hiding in the UK, where he was contacted by associates of Doku Umarov and was offered to organize a new terrorist attack. Adam agreed and went to Ukraine with a fake passport. In 2012, he was arrested after an explosion in a rented apartment - the terrorist was preparing homemade bombs. Osman and his "right hand", a Kazakh citizen, Ilya Pyanzin, admitted: they were preparing an assassination of the head of the government of Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin. The suspects also reported that they recruited fighters for future terrorist attacks in Russia. But later they took back their testimony.
Russia demanded to extradite Adam Osmayev, however, the European Court of Human Rights had blocked it, declaring: "In Russia the detainee may be subjected to torture". Pyanzin eventually was extradited to Russia, and in September 2013 he was sentenced to ten years in a colony with a strict regime.
On November 18, 2014, the court of Odessa declared a sentence for Osmaev: 2 years and 9 months imprisonment. He was released in the courtroom "for lack of evidence of preparation of assassination" - he was credited the time he already spent in jail. The court room reacted to the sentence of Osmaev with applause, and he, in turn, encouraged them to "protect Ukraine".
In February of this year Osmayev headed the Ukrainian battalion in the name of Dzhokhar Dudayev, succeeding the general, deceased under Debaltsevo, Isa Munaev.
OFFICIAL COMMENT
Dmitry Peskov: In the coming days, the prosecutors will announce the motives for the murder
"We hope that in the coming days all legal formalities will be completed and prosecutors will announce their versions of the murder, will name those who are behind this," said the President's press secretary Dmitry Peskov to the journalists of "AP", answering the question about the prospects of completing the investigation of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.
Readers Comments:
- You can't make up a better plan to frame Kadyrov through Osmaev (Kadyrov's worst enemy) and Dadaev (a traitor), and most importantly to smear Russia
- This looks like the truth. The volunteer battalion is likely curated by the SBU. And SBU is a branch of American special agencies. Classic sacrificial lamb. Technologies of color revolutions are very cynical. The fifth column doesn't realize that it is just disposable material for the puppet-masters.
- What a present to Kadyrov and Putin - Nemtsov's murder! How could Kadyrov be so fooled!
- If you continue down the trail, it might lead to the UK or Americans
Kristina Rus:
Another important point to make, is that although in Russia Nemtsov was virtually forgotten, except to the old-timers and his direct followers (he complained that he has not been on Russian TV in 8 years), Nemtsov was quite popular in Ukraine, and was frequently invited on Ukrainian TV as a Putin's critic and a supporter of the current regime, creating a perception that he was a major opposition player in Russia. Although it is true that Nemtsov was in charge of organizing the anti-Putin rallies in Russia, he himself admitted in personal conversations in his wire taps that he had no future chances in politics, because of his disastrous track record in the 1990's, when he was a Deputy Prime Minister at the time of the economic collapse in 1998. It is possible that to Ukrainian and foreign observers Nemtsov's importance looked more exaggerated then it was in reality, making him a likely candidate for a sacrificial lamb.
No matter how little attention was paid to Nemtsov by the Russian media, there is no one that the Western mainstream media can not make a celebrity overnight (even after their death) - and it was achieved.
The investigation, of course, learned about the connection to Ukraine much earlier. We can wonder if Putin tried to withhold these revelations until two weeks after the murder and after the Western media had a chance to pour all the dirt that they had on Putin and Russia, ending with the European Parliament resolution to demand independent investigation.
Now Putin can get his popcorn and watch the West change their tune after the trail lead to Ukraine. Perhaps they will try to quickly forget about it and ignore it, just like the Boeing.
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
It's not a secret to anyone, I think, that the CIA has organized thousands of assassinations of various kinds. They wouldn't hesitate for a second to do so, if it is necessary for the purpose of state security and the construction of the American world. [Why do you think the Americans did it?] Any Orange invasion needs a sacrificial lamb. We have seen this everywhere. 2-3 years ago, when there was an attempt at a revolution in Iran, a girl was killed. In Ukraine it was the "heavenly hundred". In Russia 1991, remember 3 guys were crushed by tanks. That allowed Gorbachev to put on an theatrical performance to accompany the dissolution of the Soviet Union. It's standard technology, used everywhere. The question is who is convenient as this type of sacrificial lamb? Obviously it's best if it is someone to provoke the fifth column in the country to some pre-planned, organized but supposedly spontaneous' actions. That's the basic trick. Everything was quiet, then suddenly you have a spontaneous powerful situation. Next why Nemtsov in this situation?
Because he's known around the world. As part of the spontaneous reaction it's very important to secure world-wide support, financing and consolidation. The Boeing was analogous (MH17). A Boeing had to be shot down in order to blame Russia and establish a kind of global consolidation against Russia. Here we have exactly the same story. These are terrorist atrocities. There have been dozens of terrorist atrocities here, if not hundreds: 15 police officers were recently killed in Grozny; the explosion at the train station in Volgograd; the explosion in the Moscow metro. What is the purpose of doing this? To have an inflammatory effect. Here we have a terrorist murder, a terrorist atrocity in the center of Moscow, considering that Nemtsov is known to everyone, plus the fact that the Americans don't really need him for their organizational matters they already have up-and-coming replacements. Besides, he was basically from the previous team, so to speak, and we could see that he wasn't really suitable for them on an organizational level. Also, he used to be in favor of Putin. Dig out his interviews from the beginning of the 2000s he was on the side of Putin, supported Putin. [Later he became the contrary.] And later he could have gone back again, if necessary. They understood that. They have their upcoming young replacements Navalny, for example. So they didn't really need Nemtsov any more. But someone had to be selected as the sacrificial lamb. Nemtsov was really ideal, considering those very factors.
So, why a terrorist atrocity? It's clear: the center of Moscow, Red Square, the Kremlin is right there all the right conditions for a high-profile terrorist atrocity. Something like the "heavenly hundred", but in one person. Remember, 100 people were killed by unknown snipers. Let's look at the problem in a wider perspective. The Americans had planned this powerful march in Russia, which was to kick off the Maidan. [The "Anti-crisis Spring' march"?] Yes. That's what they called it. The first to demand the march in the center of Moscow was Mr. Khodorkovsky. As if that wasn't enough, he demanded that the march be conducted even if permission wouldn't have been given. From the perspective of Khodorkovsky's letter, which we know, and his buddies who signed it, it was saying: "No matter what, we will conduct this march through the center of Moscow". Which means the preparation was begun more than a month ago. [Indeed, these things have to be done well in advance.] Right starting from that letter. Next, during the preparations for the march, begins the agitation of people and the preparation of the territory. After that the Moscow Mayor's office authorized the march to take place out in Marino (not in the center of Moscow). In principle, the organizers were fine with this. Most likely, the masterminds wouldn't have informed the march organizers about plans for such things as a terrorist atrocity, in order to avoid leaks. But the paymasters, i.e. the US Embassy, the CIA and State Dept, they had already planned for an event to happen, as a result of which their original scheme would be realized a march in the center of Moscow, right next to the Kremlin, which is also what Khodorkovsky was demanding, no matter what.
As I understand it, the masterminds knew they had to create a situation where Nemtsov enters, the sacrificial location becomes Vasilevsky Spusk (next to the Kremlin), and accordingly, an opportunity arises to conduct the march exactly where it had been originally intended. In the letter by Khodorkovsky a central location was demanded. Why did they need a (central) location like Tverskaya or Manezhka Square, or indeed Vasilevsky Spusk? In order to pave the way for storming the Kremlin. We now understand that the Americans were preparing the first events of the Moscow Maidan to be an attempt unsuccessful, but that was probably only the first attempt at storming the Kremlin. Next, the assassination, planned by the Americans, takes places at this location. Then the march returns to there. Note that the organizational machinery was anticipating 100,000 people this figure was immediately put out by Khodorkovsky. Then the organizational machine gets set off onto that. Moreover, notice how Khodorkovsky suddenly changed his position. Why do we often talk about him? Because according to the American scheme, he is the President of Russia: this march is supposed to result in bringing Khodorkovsky to power, as an interim phase, and eventually to the dissolution of Russia. Well, all of a sudden he dramatically changed his words. He was taking about Putin remaining for another 5-10 years. Then, suddenly, he says: "It's the end. Only a few days remain. It's urgent. Time to storm.". What it means is they were all expecting that the incident with the assassination of Nemtsov would launch the process, which allows them to capture the street initiative, and start their march.
Next: certain clearly professional things start to happen. Firstly, anyone who watched the march saw the so-called "red capes". We have lectures, which we give to the activists of the National Liberation Movement on how to counter-act invasions (coups). They deal with the experience of twenty or so successful orange invasions by the US, which is the technology used. In these scenarios there are always unknown snipers and red capes everywhere, or so-called brigade-leaders. We see them here too. So it's a supposedly a march of mourning, but we can clearly see several dozen redcapes. These are the brigade-leaders who coordinate the crowd.
Next aspect. Remember, we have always been saying that when the coup starts there will suddenly be strange behavior by the mass media? Suddenly. Meaning: previously they had been almost licking all over Russia, now suddenly they strangely change their mode, not necessarily in a blatant way. We observed this clearly. When 15 police officers from Grozny were killed, there definitely wasn't such hysteria and commotion as there was after the assassination of Nemtsov, even though it was public employees in a terrorist atrocity. Even following the mass atrocities in Moscow there wasn't such a commotion, there were no mourning marches and all the rest of it. When apartment buildings were blown up, there was none of this. Clearly, this is a certain idea, which has appeared and been developed. Paying tribute to Nemtsov wasn't the important part of it.
By the way, let me take this opportunity to express my condolences to his relatives. Assassination is a categorically unacceptable method, which the Americans chose to use. But that's another discussion. Anyway, the point was not about a personality. It was about a specific organizational element for conducting a march on Vasilevsky Spusk. You know, one can pay tribute in various ways. It doesn't have to be a march organized in the center of Moscow. That's where the professional elements come in. Look, it's clear that Rain TV' is part of the fifth column system. Then, suddenly, RBC TV suddenly signs up fully. Although they hadn't done to such an extent before now. So the channel RBC TV has joined with the channel Rain TV. Next: Vesti-24 is a rather strange story. We specifically recorded them. You can still see on the Internet how Vesti-24 conducted themselves after the assassination of Nemtsov, on the eve of the march. Never mind the fact that they were constantly talking about Nemtsov. People have different views of the person maybe he is very important to the editors of Vesti-24, indeed immeasurably more important than those killed in the Moscow metro or in other terrorist atrocities. [In any case, he is well-known.] What does it matter that he is well-known? What about the ordinary people, killed in the Moscow metro? [The mass media prefer to make a fuss about a famous person.] That's not what I'm getting at. Look at the professional methodology. There is a term for this "exposure".
Vesti-24 started banging into people's heads, all day long, that tomorrow there will be a march of mourning, which you absolutely have to attend. That was their logic. It's called "exposure". Let that be understood. Earlier there was an Anti-Maidan organized, which gathered a force with pro-Russian orientation. As it was a significant event, Vesti did mention it in their news ticker. However, the exposure was 1/50th of what Vesti gave to the march of mourning. In fact, the march wasn't originally planned as a mourning it was meant to turn into riots and storming of the Kremlin. [That would be hard to do out in Marino.] Obviously. But no-one had been thinking about Marino. Moreover, when the masterminds agreed to have the march moved to Marino, they knew there would be a reason I think they were in communication with the Moscow Mayor's office and everyone else a reason to move to Vasilevsky Spusk, i.e. that some kind of event would take place. What is the significance of 50 times greater exposure? It means they were psychologically dragging onto the streets people who really have nothing to do with it. They created a kind of mass tuning-fork, that there is a very important event taking place in the center of Moscow, on Vasilevsky Spusk, and you'll be cursing yourself for the rest of your life if you don't turn up to be a part of it. I was in the area and I can tell you honestly that just before the march several people approached me asking how to get to this event, not even knowing what it was about. In other words, they were simply moved to action by the emotional wave from the TV. However, there is a structure to this wave.
Don't assume that you just need to keep mentioning every minute Vasilevsky Spusk, memorial march, mourning, and so on, as if that were all. It's all an element of the preparatory propaganda for a mass phenomenon. From the Americans' perspective the combination of factors Nemtsov, their work with the fifth column in the mass media, the preparation more than a month beforehand was to create conditions such that 200-300,000 people would attend. In principle, it could have happened. Their projection was not so far from the reality. I'll tell you why it didn't work out, why 25-30,000 people attended, or, by the highest estimates, 40-50 thousand. Take the official numbers 25-27,000. Okay, let's take 50,000, it doesn't matter. It's not enough to organize a mob for some anti-social actions. It's clear that there were militants there, brought in from Ukraine. It was no coincidence that they caught a professional militant with a deputy's credentials. But there were hundreds there. I mean Honcharenko he is a professional Maidan organizer, capable of organizing these things. He has the status of Deputy as a cover, but that doesn't matter. Also there were T-shirts printed with Nemtsov's image, but that's another story. You know, it takes a week to print them. Moreover, only on working days the printers don't work on weekends. They weren't drawn at home with a stencil, they were printed by a firm. We know this, because we print plenty of our own T-shirts. So it takes minimum one week, and at that only on working days, even if you really beg them. Printing them in one night is impossible. In other words, it's clear this was all organized in advance. Of course, those who did the printing didn't know that Nemtsov would be assassinated and were given some other motivation to print, which, by the way, the investigation will need to find out. They could have just been told that Nemtsov was one of the leaders of the march, and that's why people should wear his T-shirt, seemingly with an ambiguous hint that he had been killed. [I strongly suspect there were Navalny T-shirts too.] In reserve it's entirely possible. But they weren't handed out at the critical moment.
Navalny is another interesting story. He's not an idiot, that's for sure. I saw something that I'd never seen before: he was agitating in the metro for some rallies or protests of his, although he holds them regularly. Maximum five people were agitating there. I think this was all a fake, a script, for the purpose of getting him jailed. Thus he was out of the picture including from a possible assassination of himself. He had figured out that it could happen to him. The Americans couldn't care less for them we're all natives', including the traitors here, and me and you, we're all natives'. They are not going to consider human lives. In Ukraine do they consider the lives of their own people? Look how many of their own have been killed now, I mean those who faithfully serve the American occupying regime. For sure they won't feel pity for their own guys: Nemtsov, Navalny or anyone else. That's why Navalny did a runner. He also got himself an alibi. At the same time, he wasn't participating in the events, which could have turned into an attempted storming of the Kremlin. And although it would have repulsed, it would still have initiated an irreversible process. People would have asked, where was Navalny during the storming? Well, he wouldn't have been there, because he got 15 days in jail (violation of release terms). Remember the last time Navalny was jailed for 15 days? The US Secretary of State was screaming about it. But this time complete silence.
We also have to understand that this assassination is the first shot in the internal invasion into the Russian Federation itself. In Ukraine the first shot was the bleeding in the squares, on Hrushevsky street, the "heavenly hundred", and so on and so forth. In Russia, it was the shooting of Nemtsov. That was the first shot. That's how the Americans have planned it. What was supposed to happen next was the attempted storming of the Kremlin, which, even though it would have been repulsed, it would have changed the situation in Russia the whole story of the "bloody regime" would have begun. A few of our own people would have been slaughtered in the clashes. And so we would now have our own symbolic Russian "heavenly hundred". On that basis they would have fortified their positions on Vasilevsky Spusk, even without actually taking the Kremlin. Next comes the standard scenario: tires, tents, and the whole machinery starts working. But it fell through.
By the way, those who attended this mourning march were not the usual people, there were women with infants people who don't normally attend political events. [Why not they came to pay tribute.] A small number came to pay tribute those who remember him. Nemtsov is not such a familiar figure here any more. For the Americans yes. People attended because they were brought out for this spectacle of mourning. The TV told them that in the center of Moscow there will be a very important event, which you must attend, in order to feel part of this important event, which the mass media presenters were talking about every minute. Imagine you're a housewife slicing cucumber in your kitchen. The TV is making a noise from the other room, saying to you every minute: "Assembly for mourning, city center, Vasilevsky Spusk, got to go there, so important, such an important event is happening". Someone not interested in politics will unwittingly think: "Such an important event, I need to be there. Otherwise am I supposed to tell my children that I wasn't there? Something important is taking place." Meanwhile, those for whom the Anti-Maidan intuition was in effect, in their brain a "stop" signal came up: "No, I'm not going to that, to be on the safe side". But those who ended up there as the object of the socio-political experiment they were about 50,000 people. The militants among them numbered about 5,000. Such were the results. In principle, Navalny has about 5,000 militants in Moscow, no more. They could bring more from Ukraine only once the tires and tents are in place. That's when the disloyalty begins in the lines of communications.
So, Navalny's 5,000 militants are in the city center. Navalny himself has an alibi: he's at the police station for 15 days. In theory, he has nothing to do with it. 2-300,000 people gather. But so many people cannot all get into this street, onto the embankment. They pour off on all sides. From there they crash through the police cordons, then through Varvarka street and Ilinka street and from other directions. They don't pass through the barriers, they try to get around them on all sides. I saw people passing on all sides. They just went around the barriers. If you remember there were barriers around Slavianskaya Square. That's where the police were allowing people to pass through. At those barriers you can stop 5,000 people, even 10,000, but you can't stop 100,000 or 200,000. [If they start trampling.] Where else are they to go?
That's what Navalny's 5,000 militants are there for, with their red capes to direct the crowd. They can ignite events at a certain point, for example with some explosion. Although even without an explosion 100,000 people can be provoked in various ways by crushing, and so on. This crushing sweeps away the barriers and the police. Moreover the police had nothing. So instead of a mourning event what begins is a mish-mash of squabbles, fights, crushing, in which 100-200 people die just from the crushing there are children there, women with infants. This has all been worked out. Why do you think Vesti-24 was pumping up the size of this irregular crowd. So you have crushing, shouting and people begin to take fright. A crowd of 200-300 thousand starts getting enraged. All the while Navalny's 5,000 militants are maintaining and directing the crowd, along with specialists from Ukraine around 500 of them were brought in, led by that Deputy. Then the enraged crowd, which wants to run to somewhere, gets directed towards the main target Red Square and the Kremlin. For sure, the world's mass media will be there with their cameras to see the storming of the Kremlin. [The Kremlin is difficult to storm.] That doesn't matter it doesn't have to be taken.
Then begins the storming, the crushing against the Kremlin walls. 100 people get crushed to death at the walls of the Kremlin before the world's cameras. Jumping over the wall isn't necessary. Then people get knocked into the (nearby) Moscow river it's no coincidence the rally was held at the embankment a couple of thousand people fall into the river. The pressure from the crowd will overrun any barriers. Why do you think such a route was worked out if people had been let into Varvarka Street, then you wouldn't have 1-2,000 people being chucked into the river. So some of those people would have drowned. Think Hodynka. Remember what that is? (Hodynka: 1,389 people crushed to death in 1896). It led to the 1917 Russian Revolution. Here we would have a parallel, with hundreds of people drowning and being crushed. [Sorry to interrupt. Upon the accession to the throne of Nicholas II, for which he was called bloody', a thousand people, if I remember rightly, were crushed on the square. Moreover, they weren't trying to kill anyone, they came to collect presents.] Yes, candies were being handed out. But the logic is the same. As a result, you can imagine, hundreds of people drown, are crushed, including children and infants. How do you read that, in the center of Moscow? Would Putin survive that? [Don't know ... it depends.] From the Americans' perspective he shouldn't. They have worked out the logic. After that they get onto their lines of communication to business, civil servants, the fifth column saying, "You see what sort of country you are living in? You see who your leadership is and what they have caused?". Like it was back in the day.
Then you see how that very evening all the major media in Russia switch to harsh mode, open their so-called "Package No.2", which has already been given to them by the US Embassy. They all have someone at the level of chief editor, already trained from America, or someone at a high level who will take upon himself control of the channel, in case the chief editor has some doubts. [You mean, give him a kick.] Of course. And the deputy editor. They will say to the staff: "You can see what a bloody mess it is. Whose side are you on?". So he seizes control of the channel. Then Navalny's militants, who are ready to go, burst into the TV station. The crowd jailbreaks Navalny, leads him out. So the TV is captured, the fifth column in government surrenders, which they are ready to do now, and control of the country is seized. That's the scenario ordered by the US Embassy. That's why Nemtsov was killed, you understand? For _ that _ scenario they don't mind losing Nemtsov. After that Nemtsov will be forgotten. Everyone will be talking about hundreds of killed, crushed, drowned. You get it? That's the scenario ordered by the US Embassy. That's what Nemtsov was killed for. And that's how they seize control.
Next, their options are: Pressure on Putin; Seizing control; Pressure on the State Duma; - Forcibly installing Deputies into the Duma. But actually that's not necessary: They just need to take 100 Deputies here, and those 100 will always say, "There were 400 of us". No-one is going to verify it. TV is on the side of the enemy, the invader, the occupier, and reports on decisions made by the Duma. How TV conduct themselves we have seen already. Accordingly, Ilya Ponomarev (ex-pat Deputy), who is hiding in Kiev, Washington and New York, will be brought into the Duma he already talked about this in Kiev. It was all prepared while he was there. The Ukrainian Deputy flew in already wearing the T-shirt with the image of Nemtsov. From those T-shirts one could understand that Nemtsov had been killed. The commanding staff had already met. The main points are decided in the US Embassy, while the detailed process is up to the Maidan specialists, who gained experience one year ago. Several hundred specialists with this experience are working in the commanding staff planning the detailed sequence of events. Ponomarev went to them. He is now waiting to be taken into the Duma. The Duma "convened" on that very evening, those who could, because they had to quickly capture the initiative. That very evening they would have removed Naryshkin (Duma Chairman) and elected Ponomarev instead. That's what the Americans intended, by assassinating Nemtsov. God spared us from a disaster, comparable to the detonation of numerous nuclear bombs on Russian territory.
Because the waves would have followed. Why do you think Khodorkovsky was saying that Putin will be ousted quickly. He said that look it up. After that begins a long period of destabilization. Let me translate Khodorkovsky's words: Thereafter millions of people will be killed across all towns & cities of Russia. He was writing under the pretext of destabilization in Moscow, the battle for power, and so on. So the Americans have planned their game under the title "battle for power", who will battle with whom for that power. Ponomarev would have been sitting in the Duma by now saying: "bring in the new leader of the government" to be confirmed by the Duma, remember. And he would be the acting President. The Duma would have decided about the procedures. As it was in the Supreme Rada. Just look at how it was done in the Rada. That's what was all planned. The Duma is right next to Kremlin. After the initial mess and crushing, 1-2,000 people will be brought out to seize the Duma. Moreover, this is all part of the the informational backdrop. The Duma security is very unlikely to just sit and wait for an enraged mob to run up to them. They will be getting information from TV, radio and everywhere else. This is the simple scenario, which has been completed successfully 20 times. What I'm saying is nothing new. I'm describing the standard scenario, described in the standard procedures, which are known to the specialists since long ago.
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
Quote:Foreign experts, including those living in countries that have had a first hand experience with "color revolutions", continue to discuss the provocative murder of Boris Nemtsov committed some 250 yards away from the Kremlin's walls. Most of them agree that there are two primary possibilities behind this assassination.
The first is an all time favorite of all the media sources owned by Washington, which states that there must be some kind involvement by Russian authorities. But aside from purely propagandist concerns there's no reason to assume something so utterly absurd, since there's no scenario in which Nemtsov could present any real threat to Russia's leading politicians. However, the former US Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, had made attempts, as fruitless as they may be, to make Boris Nemtsov the "Leader of the Opposition", although he got only 4% of votes in the Russian parliamentary elections in December 2003, and failing to win the Sochi mayor election in 2009.
However, when considering this version, one can't fail to notice how prompt and well-coordinated the anti-Putin voices were, starting with the US President and the media accountable to the White House and followed by US intelligence agencies. And this, in turn, unwittingly suggests that there actually was some sort of Western involvement in the murder of Boris Nemtsov. This version is perhaps the most popular one, since it has been voiced internationally by a number of independent observers. It should be noted that two years ago Vladimir Putin himself had already expressed his concerns that the West may attempt to create an "involuntary martyr" by murdering a member of the Russian opposition to try to "demonize" Russia's image even further.
It curious that in less than 30 days after the assassination, US propaganda has been trying to push blame on Russian leaders by claiming that the investigation is being "intentionally delayed", yet nobody has mentioned the investigation into the assassination of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, which has been intentionally delayed for 30 years.
Still, there's a certain percentage of Western citizens who seem unwilling to question the West's official narrative, and should recall certain known facts about the CIA's involvement in political assassinations all across the globe aimed at destabilizing certain sovereign states that are allegedly "not friendly enough" to the US.
Recently the Washington Post has reported that the CIA was involved in the assassination of the leader of Hezbollah in Damascus back in 2008. But somehow, the international community has not condemned this crime, even though it was a vivid case of political assassination carried out in the territory of a sovereign foreign state. For some reason the UN which should be leading the international fight against such criminality has not introduced sanctions against the US, sanctions that should immediately follow any acts of state sponsored terrorism or assassinations according to the resolutions that had been previously adopted by the UN!
However, such acts of terrorism carried out by the US intelligence community are no longer surprising. In the past seven decades of its existence, the CIA and its operations have taken the lives of millions in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe.
Recently, well-executed rouge murderings of political activists have become the modus operandi of choice of the White House aimed at creating chaos in certain countries that still await the promotion of American-style "democracy." These tactics have been used a countless number of times by US intelligence agencies, while the "martyrs" of the opposition are then brought forward by the United States as a matter of contention. Should such opposition figures fail to achieve political destabilization in a country, they are often used as sacrificial lambs, with their deaths usually followed by a massive propaganda campaign aimed to build tension in a targeted state. This well-tested CIA "recipe" is at least fifty years old, and was even described in the "Handbook on Political Murder", used time and time again in Latin America and other regions.
Recently a case similar to the Nemtsov murder happened in Argentina. It was the "mysterious death" of chief prosecutor Alberto Nisman, the blame for which Washington and US intelligence agencies have been trying to shift on the President of Argentina Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and thereby destabilize the political situation in the country .
Earlier, another "mysterious death" of journalist Georgy Gongadze in Ukraine in 2000 was used by US intelligence agencies to foment the "orange revolution" that allowed a pro-Western politician, Viktor Yushchenko, to take power.
As it was pointed out by prominent historian and researcher William Blum, in the period from 1945 to 2003, the United States attempted to overthrow the governments in more than 40 countries, created more than 30 alleged "patriotic movements" overseas, which resulted in the deaths of several million people. With this US "tool of destruction" the Central Intelligence Agency carries on its subversive activities around the world, murdering political activists en masse in attempts at destabilizing countries that refuse to follow the instructions issued by Washington. It's only a matter of time before US fingerprints arefound in Nemtsov's murder case
.
Vladimir Odintsov, political commentator, exclusively for the online magazine "New Eastern Outlook".
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
Our readers is following the investigation of the murder of Boris Nemtsov , will remember: the policy was accompanied by a friend - Ukrainian model Anna Duritskaya. The girl testified, and go home to Ukraine.
Evidence in the trash
But, as it turned out, Anna knows much more than told investigators.
- Immediately after the murder Duritskaya walked to slow down on the bridge of snow machines - explains our source close to the investigation. - Ask the driver to call from her cell in the "soon", referring to the fact that she can not do this - nervous shock. The driver called the doctors and left, observing the working instructions (not entitled to stay in one place). Further, as shown by the study records with CCTV cameras, Duritskaya approached the garbage can - the container that was temporarily installed in the pocket of the bridge for cleaning work. And something there threw ...
After detention Duritskaya gave operatives cell from which a snowplow driver called "soon". It would seem that any claims to witness no. But the trash, which was taken from the bridge, has been tested - and it found a mobile phone. It was established that he belonged Duritskaya.
The word at the time of the murder of Anna Nemtsov had two mobile device.
Discarded phone studied. And they found therein chip set (Light), which input signals. According to investigators, through this mobile organizers murder tracked couple Duritskaya and Nemtsov.
Among lovers - Titushky
- There is reason to believe that the Ukrainian model is not a random figure in the case, - continues our source. - Now it turns out its role. And view the relationship with Nalivaychenko (head of the SBU, the Ukrainian Security Service. - Ed.).
- That is Duritskaya - SBU agent?
- Draw conclusions early. But it was framed to Nemtsov is not just. Through it clearly led policy.
- But she threw the phone with a beacon! It turns out that she knew about the murder?
- Is not necessary. Perhaps she knew that it is used to spy on Nemtsov, but did not realize the ultimate goal. And after the murder came insight and Duritskaya rid of the evidence.
- Then why is it released?
- In order to better understand its contacts. The version that the strings are drawn to Ukraine, remains the primary. I will say this: not only in Ukraine, but also beyond.
There were a lot of fans Duritskaya. One ex-boyfriend was a sportsman Vadim Titushky from White Church, near Kiev. There they met. Titushky name became a household word after in 2013 he was involved in a brawl against the opposition, beat television journalist was detained. Sentenced him to two years probation. Since then, and coined the term "Titushky" - so called young people behind the scenes political groups used as mercenaries for fights and provocations.
A Duritskaya recruited, according to the investigation, Yuri Birch, the current commander of the battalion "Dnepr-1". Anna had a close relationship with him. He also introduced three years ago Duritskaya Nemtsov.
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
