Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2017JFK.org has been launched with content
#31
Albert Doyle Wrote:I think some people are deluding themselves that America isn't an honor-less country or that its government would respond to calls for honesty or justice.

Hi Albert, nice to meet you. May I suggest, that if there are rats in the nest, we excise them?

Quote: Calls for the American government to come forth and reveal previously unshown documents shows a lack of understanding of what that government is and how it operates. This is a society that now offers Donald Trump as a serious presidential candidate.

The only reason Donald Trump has poll numbers is because the rest of the field is full of weasels. Trump is the only candidate in any party who's willing to stand up and say "9/11 happened on Bush's watch". It's a simple truth that the Republican establishment has been completely unwilling and unable to deal with, and that's why Donald Trump is now their unwanted flagship candidate. Trump has to be a complete embarrassment to the party leadership, however as long as the establishment weasels are unwilling to come clean and admit they were snookered by the Neo-Cons then Trump is going to continue to poll. Every time Trump says something outrageous to ding the establishment he picks up another five points in the polls. (The game is wearing thin at this point, but it's still working - his comments on Bush will probably get him another few points next week).

Our society is not "offering" Donald Trump, we are selecting him as the lesser of the evils.

Yeah, imagine that.

It's what you're talking about, though.
Reply
#32
Alan Dale Wrote:Announcing a new Call to Action

Over the next two years it is vitally important that we stay apprised and become involved.

Please sign up to stay informed as we approach the scheduled declassification of all JFK assassination related files: http://2017jfk.org/#home

Hi Alan, this is great stuff! I wish you the best of success.

IMO, politics is kind of like economics, at the end of the day it's all about confidence. And, how can anyone have confidence in a government that thinks it can exclude its own citizens from the definition of "national security"?

If Kennedy got removed 'cause he couldn't keep his pecker in his pants, then tell us. We'll understand. But don't be feeding us some BS story about a disgruntled ex-Marine, it just won't wash.

I've smelled some very ugly issues in this mess, for quite some time now. The racial angle gets increasingly horrifying every time I have the misfortune to be made aware of it. I was just reading about some Colonel who came up with a plan to put all the black people in concentration camps in the event of national racial unrest. I was just reading a whole entire book full of reports from the 112th MIG on nothing but racial issues, every time there was six or eight blacks involved they wrote up a report about it. This isn't some JBS group or some wealthy ultra-rich fruitcakes, this is official stuff, stuff that's being transmitted up through official military channels because someone in a position of authority requested that it be so.

If any of this has anything to do with JFK, it's easy to see how it could be viewed by certain people as "dangerous to national security". However, it would be hard to imagine black people "trusting" their government any less than they already do. And right at the moment, this government isn't getting a whole lotta love from white people either. And it occurs to me, that ultimately it's far more important to have your citizens confident in your operations and "trusting" you to the extent possible, than it is to keep them in the dark about matters of vital national importance.

No one is going to "trust" this government as long as it refuses to disclose historical truth that happened fifty whole years ago. The only reason I can think of for something like that, is that some of the principals are still alive. George HW Bush might be the last one, everyone else is dead. No one with a brain is going to buy a "national security" excuse for stuff that happened fifty years ago, and if that's really the government's argument then they should be forced to prove it to the Supreme Court. We already know about the Mafia, we already know about MK/ULTRA, we probably even know the generals were involved in the JFK hit somehow. What could possibly be worse than that? We already know our government was doing some horrible stuff during the early 60's, we know all about the drug smuggling, and the acts of international terrorism, and the political assassinations.... what could possibly be worse than that? What does this government believe, is likely to send this country into so much shock, that it would be a matter of national security if it were to happen?

I predict that the release of those records is going to leave this whole playing field even more confused than it already is.

The real stuff that we really need is already gone. Like the ONI files, for instance. And the contents of Angleton's safes. And the DPS records.

What Oswald did with the CIA might be "interesting", but I don't believe it's anywhere close to the whole story. (I have a theory, do you want to hear it? Yuk...)

I'm on board for making people aware of what's supposed to happen in 2017. I think though, we should prepare ourselves for a PR letdown. (And, if we're smart, anticipate that and turn it around and use it to our advantage).
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Kennedy, Nixon Launched Political TV Era' Bernice Moore 0 2,181 14-02-2011, 07:22 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)