Posts: 93
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
Thank you for both replies.
Yes, I have not read The Man Who Knew Too Much but am familiar with the Nagell case.
And yes, I could listen to Barbour for another hour at least. He had some fascinating revelations (not necessarily just about JFK)
Amazing stuff. He's a treasure.
Posts: 2,665
Threads: 378
Likes Received: 3 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2010
Yes, I liked it also.
Isn't it odd that he offered his video to both Stone, and then some web sites and they would not carry it.
In the first instance, I think that Oliver was just plain misadvised. For him to executive produce the Garrison Tapes would have been very helpful to his film JFK. If I had been advising him I sure would have had him at least look at the stuff and let John tell him what he had in mind for the film.
John never contacted me about running the film at CTKA. I would have definitely been interested.
But what to make of that nasty note he said he got from JFK Lancer? That is odd is it not?
Posts: 93
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
It seemed odd to me but then again, I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of the JFK research world. I'm just a long time curious amateur that believes the assassination is a significant pivot point in our history, with direct connections to our current events. Its fascinating. And frustrating at times too. It's not easy to discern good information from bad. So now I just stick with anything 'DiEugenio' ;-)
