30-08-2014, 01:13 PM
Corruption is okay at the IMF obviously, whereas sexual predation is not.
Or is it (he said tongue-in-cheek) simply a case of choosing someone who will bow to American direction irrespective of their proclivities?
Or is it (he said tongue-in-cheek) simply a case of choosing someone who will bow to American direction irrespective of their proclivities?
Quote:Christine Lagarde given vote of confidence by IMF board
The International Monetary Fund chief can continue to effectively carry out her duties' despite corruption investigation
- Associated Press in Washington
- theguardian.com, Saturday 30 August 2014 04.49 BST
Christine Lagarde has the confidence of the IMF board. Photograph: Adam Berry/Getty Images
The executive board of the International Monetary Fund has expressed confidence in its managing director, Christine Lagarde, after receiving a briefing on a French corruption investigation.
In a brief statement, the 24-member board said it continued to have "confidence in the managing director's ability to effectively carry out her duties".
Lagarde called the investigation "without basis" after answering questions before magistrates in Paris on Wednesday. She and her former chief of staff are facing questions about their role in an arbitration ruling that handed 400m euros ($531m) to the French businessman Bernard Tapie.
Tapie had sued the French bank Credit Lyonnais for its handling of the sale of his majority stake in the sportswear company Adidas in the mid-1990s.
In its statement, the IMF board said, "It would not be appropriate to comment on a case that has been and is currently before the French judiciary."
In her statement on Wednesday, Lagarde said that after three years of proceedings and dozens of hours of questioning, the court had found no evidence that she had done anything wrong and that the only remaining allegation "is that I was not sufficiently vigilant".
She said she was returning to Washington and her work at the IMF.
Under French law, the action to put Lagarde under official investigation is equivalent to a preliminary charge, which means there is reason to suspect an infraction. Investigating judges can later decide to drop the case or issue a formal charge and send the matter to trial.
![[Image: bb7b6ac1-2785-4759-a58f-e8e21a971f3a-460x276.jpeg]](http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/8/30/1409370424780/bb7b6ac1-2785-4759-a58f-e8e21a971f3a-460x276.jpeg)
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14