Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
San Diego Reader
#1
This newsprint magazine publication put out an article entitled "9-11 Could Have Been Stopped In San Diego" in their September 8 2016 edition. The article details how 9-11 terrorists Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi were allowed to live untouched in San Diego even though they were on CIA terror radar. The article details how they escaped detection because of a CIA overriding of FBI triggering due to Saudi Intel agent Omar al-Bayoumi trying to recruit the two Al Qaeda suicide hijackers into Saudi Intelligence prior to 9-11.

The article simply accepts FBI agent James Bernazzini's explanation of the intelligence lapse unquestioningly and never asks the obvious question: "Was this done deliberately by shadow Intel controllers as a pretext to allowing these shadow operatives to pull-off 9-11 in a false flag attack?" Typical of the American Press the question is so dangerous and outrageous that it is simply accepted that it cannot be possible and therefore is never asked. This is typical of the psychological warfare of placing the obvious in broad daylight while flagrantly avoiding its meaning. An enforcement of conventional normalcy against the outrageously apparent...Evil notice while enjoying the sick pleasure of untouchability...
Reply
#2
I just saw Chris Hayes on MSNBC advocate a false flag conspiracy theory. Unfortunately, it was in Russia. He said that the 1999 apartment bombings were "blamed on Islamic terrorists, but most likely ordered by Vladimir Putin."

This just make me crazy. False flag conspiracies are NEVER discussed in the US media, except on those very rare occasions when they can be used to show how horrible other countries are.
Reply
#3
Tracy Riddle Wrote:I just saw Chris Hayes on MSNBC advocate a false flag conspiracy theory. Unfortunately, it was in Russia. He said that the 1999 apartment bombings were "blamed on Islamic terrorists, but most likely ordered by Vladimir Putin."

This just make me crazy. False flag conspiracies are NEVER discussed in the US media, except on those very rare occasions when they can be used to show how horrible other countries are.

That is because the USA is 'exceptional' and under God's direct supervision - it never does evil things on purpose nor engages in conspiracies. :Secret:

The Reader in both San Diego and L.A. do good investigative journalism from time to time. San Diego is not only a 'military town - mostly Navy, but not only; it is also a 'CIA town'. Trust me, I know from hard experience - I lived there and faced the Beast there....... Between the groups of soon-to-be-patsies-for-911-untruth in San Diego, just like their twins in Florida, were all already [IMHO] intelligence assets of a foreign nation [likely S.A.- perhaps others too] and the CIA and/or FBI. No one stopped them because they had a 'get-outta-jail-free-card' ever since they all came through the same dodgy visa office. That the Reader didn't go all the way in asking the obvious questions is too bad, but they are correct in the presumption that '911 could have been stopped' in San Diego [or Florida and elsewhere], if and only if it had been wanted to be stopped - which it was not [wanted to be stopped]!
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#4
It is painfully obvious that just because al-Bayoumi was trying to recruit the two terrorists doesn't mean CIA would have simply dropped monitoring of those two hot operatives. It is stupid to not realize that CIA could technically abide by the Saudi's request to not interfere and blow their cover while still monitoring what was a clearly organizing major terror attack against the US. It is stupid to ask people to believe that and something CIA would never have done under normal operating procedure. They simply wouldn't have ignored prime terror behavior simply because Saudi Arabia was trying to turn them.
Reply
#5
And don't forget they were living with Shaikh Abdussattar, FBI informant to the San Diego office since 1994, later protected after 9/11 by Attorney General Ashcroft. FBI refused to allow the Joint Congressional Inquiry to talk to him. Shaikh's FBI handler only testified secretly later. In 2003 the FBI gave Shaikh $100,000 and closed his contract. His whole background as a Professor was phony, with a phony PhD purchased from a bogus diploma mill run by people with U.S. military and intelligence connections

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdussattar_Shaikh
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp...tar_shaikh
Reply
#6
I just finished watching "The Man Who Knew", a PBS/Frontline special on John O'Neill, the FBI counterterrorist expert that was a) prevented from returning to Yemen to investigate the Cole incident by the US State Department, and b) was forced to resign from the FBI and c) took a job as head of security in the World Trade Center and was killed there on his first day on the job. His drinking buddy, Christopher Isham, formerly of ABC, but now VP of CBS News Washington, said (at about 45 minutes in) that "it was known that Yemenis were involved in the 9/11 attacks."

I don't recall any hijackers from Yemen. I wonder to whom he was referring.

There is also one strange sight at 50 minutes in. A tallish guy with a white shirt and dark hair raises both fists over his head as he watches the South Tower fall. That is as close to "seeing thousands of people in New Jersey celebrating" (a Trumpism) as I have ever seen.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#7
Drew Phipps Wrote:I just finished watching "The Man Who Knew", a PBS/Frontline special on John O'Neill, the FBI counterterrorist expert that was a) prevented from returning to Yemen to investigate the Cole incident by the US State Department, and b) was forced to resign from the FBI and c) took a job as head of security in the World Trade Center and was killed there on his first day on the job. His drinking buddy, Christopher Isham, formerly of ABC, but now VP of CBS News Washington, said (at about 45 minutes in) that "it was known that Yemenis were involved in the 9/11 attacks."

I don't recall any hijackers from Yemen. I wonder to whom he was referring.

Ramzi bin al-Shibh is from Yemen, accused of being a "key facilitator for the September 11 attacks", was held at Guantanamo (still there I believe) and was tortured by the CIA.

Khallad bin Attash is another Yemeni who was tortured at a CIA black site in Poland, and accused of training 9/11 hijackers.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)