McCann's Embedded Confessions - parts 1-3

[Paul Rigby]

Richard Hall

Published on Nov 25, 2016

In November 2016 I travelled to the United States to meet and interview Peter Hyatt. Peter is a highly respected expert in statement analysis and in his work he teaches other professionals and assists law enforcement on criminal cases. When we speak, the process of constructing sentences in our mind involves deciding which tense to use, which words to select from our vocabulary and what order to put them in. This mental process all happens in a fraction of a second. If somebody is constructing sentences from their experiential memory, ie, recalling something real that actually happened to them, the process of word selection follows particular patterns and characteristics, which can be easily identified by a trained statement analyst. If however a person is fabricating and being untruthful when they speak, the natural cognitive process of choosing and ordering words is interrupted, because the mind must censor and insert artificial information in a very short time period. This means the language of somebody who is fabricating is characteristically different and can be picked up by a trained analyst like Peter Hyatt. He has analysed in depth an interview that Kate and Gerry McCann gave in 2011 and throughout the entire interview both Kate and Gerry it appears show signs of deception. Not only that, Peter determines from their language what he believes to be what it is they are concealing. The conclusions are shocking.

Part 1: [video=youtube_share;slziMpXYjJo]http://youtu.be/slziMpXYjJo[/video]

Part 2: [video=youtube_share;qyB29g6nbDo]http://youtu.be/qyB29g6nbDo[/video]

Part 3: [video=youtube_share;VWWjkL-joS4]http://youtu.be/VWWjkL-joS4[/video]

[Peter Lemkin]

Makes me wonder if any such experts have or would look at statements made by Oswald, members of the Warren Commission, etc.; Bush, Rumsfeld, Chaney on 911, etc. et al. Using this on 'ordinary' crimes is fine, but what about on false-flag operations and wars.....

[Paul Rigby]

Makes me wonder if any such experts have or would look at statements made by Oswald, members of the Warren Commission, etc.; Bush, Rumsfeld, Chaney on 911, etc. et al. Using this on 'ordinary' crimes is fine, but what about on false-flag operations and wars.....

Go to the end of part 3, Peter, and you'll find that he has (FDR's speech in response to Pearl Harbor, which Hyatt found deceptive); and that Hall asks Hyatt to examine a press conference on the moon landing.

[Paul Rigby]

Pt 5.The True Story Of Madeleine McCann.

Published on Oct 27, 2014

In the final episode of his series, Richard Hall details the astonishingly early involvement of the British state, both overt and deep, in the case:

[video=youtube_share;FbHZGc2FHic]http://youtu.be/FbHZGc2FHic[/video]