Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Poyle
#11
Scott Kaiser Wrote:
LR Trotter Wrote:
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Hey! It's you.... The people you call yourselves "researchers" who are really interested in this shit, I can care less! I just told you what happened, you must find what I said, didn't think you were going to find that document of October 1963, betcha no one believed me when I said Poyle was there on October 10, 1963 after I've already proven he was there on November 21, 1963. You know, the day before the old dude who f%*ed up the BOP's got whacked, I've told you the truth, and you've never heard of me until 50 years later, honestly, I don't give a shit which rabbit hole you want to travel down, so long as I know what I'm saying is the truth, that's all that matters to me!!!


Strictly for clarification, and I have no desire to take a bite of this apple, by chance Scott, is BPO's a typo for BOP's?


Bay of Pigs. No biggie, I have what you might call a disorder of dyslexia, on top of that, I've recently been diagnose having dementia. The laughs may begin!

Thanks Scott. But, there will be no laughs from me.

Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch

Reply
#12
Scott Kaiser Wrote:
Peter Lemkin Wrote:
Harry Dean Wrote:Just now noticed, an 1975 book by Hugh McDonald "Appointment In Dallas" suggesting
the JFK Assassination hinged on the so called Mystery Man in Mexico City 1963 and
named Harry Dean as that person. McDonald was a book writer, LA Co. Cop and loco.


Harry, you don't look anything like the 'mystery man' seen in M.C. at the embassy, but may I ask [feel free to reply publicly or to me privately if you prefer] were you in M.C. anytime in 1963, and if so, did you stay at or pass through the Luma? And if so, did you talk to the waiter/bartender or the manager [or Buick] - or know anything about them from other sources? It is something I'm working on now, so anything would help. PM me if you'd rather not put it here publicly. Thanks much.

IDK.... Peter, I've seen Mr. Dean's earlier photo, and if Harry didn't have more curly hair then "our Man in Mexi" I would swar he looked just like him, unfortunately, it was Richard Poyle, I don't understand how many times I have to tell you people and why you can't understand!

There is no supporting evidence for Richard Poyle being in MExico City on Oct 2, 4 and 15 when the Mystery Man photos were taken... He arrived in Monterrey after Oct 17th...

Whether he was at the embassy in Mexico on Nov 21 and 22... Proof will easily settle the question.

So far this remains one of the only docs containing the name POYLE... and it talks of "standing by to meet POYLE" LIFIRE as I posted, was the follow and watch group the LI program
So far we can get POYLE to Monterrey... MEXI is not Mexico City but just the country.

Look at the bottom note: "POYLE SHOULD BE SENT...." Future tense.

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=9331&stc=1]


Attached Files
.jpg   63-10-17 POYLE to be watched by CIA LIFIRE assets 104-10093-10047.jpg (Size: 312.9 KB / Downloads: 17)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#13
Scott Kaiser Wrote:IDK.... Peter, I've seen Mr. Dean's earlier photo, and if Harry didn't have more curly hair then "our Man in Mexi" I would swar he looked just like him, unfortunately, it was Richard Poyle, I don't understand how many times I have to tell you people and why you can't understand!

A WARNING - A FINAL WARNING TO SCOTT KAISER!!! STOP immediately your infantile angry language and trying to 'talk down' to the rest of us. You don't get to 'TELL' [force] anyone what to 'UNDERSTAND' [only see it your way] here. Behave and have your say and respect others or you will be made to disappear here at the push of a button. We've let you break every rule endlessly and march around as if you knew everything the rest of the stupid people on the Forum and in the World did not. Leave your ego somewhere else when you post here....or else.... You have your ideas and others have theirs. You have no corner on the absolute truth and stop acting as you do or be gone...and if you don't go on your own and continue to act like that...you'll be gone by other means. Basta! Grow Up! 'you people' indeed. The problem is you Scott - your manner, your ego, your endlessly breaking the rules on purpose to get attention. Your food fights will no longer be allowed. Your insults will no longer be allowed. Don't test this - just behave! If anyone else cares that Scott remain here, you had best put in a word to him to cool his 'act' and childish acting out. And please spare us the usual reaction to a warning like this Scott of 'I don't care'. You do care. Your ego cares - but your ego is about to loose a foothold here if you don't watch your next step.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#14
Peter Lemkin Wrote:
Scott Kaiser Wrote:IDK.... Peter, I've seen Mr. Dean's earlier photo, and if Harry didn't have more curly hair then "our Man in Mexi" I would swar he looked just like him, unfortunately, it was Richard Poyle, I don't understand how many times I have to tell you people and why you can't understand!

A WARNING - A FINAL WARNING TO SCOTT KAISER!!! STOP immediately your infantile angry language and trying to 'talk down' to the rest of us. You don't get to 'TELL' [force] anyone what to 'UNDERSTAND' [only see it your way] here. Behave and have your say and respect others or you will be made to disappear here at the push of a button. We've let you break every rule endlessly and march around as if you knew everything the rest of the stupid people on the Forum and in the World did not. Leave your ego somewhere else when you post here....or else.... You have your ideas and others have theirs. You have no corner on the absolute truth and stop acting as you do or be gone...and if you don't go on your own and continue to act like that...you'll be gone by other means. Basta! Grow Up! 'you people' indeed. The problem is you Scott - your manner, your ego, your endlessly breaking the rules on purpose to get attention. Your food fights will no longer be allowed. Your insults will no longer be allowed. Don't test this - just behave! If anyone else cares that Scott remain here, you had best put in a word to him to cool his 'act' and childish acting out. And please spare us the usual reaction to a warning like this Scott of 'I don't care'. You do care. Your ego cares - but your ego is about to loose a foothold here if you don't watch your next step.


Then so be it, get with the rest of the cast and crew, and vote me out if you have too, but I'm NOT talking down to or forcing ANYTHING on anyone, I gave you information only I know, and shared with you the truth, YOU are suppose to discredit what I say, if you point out that he wasn't there in October, and I say he was, and I can prove it you don't want to listen, does that make you a numbnut? Now Peter, I'm not saying you are.
Reply
#15
David Josephs Wrote:
Scott Kaiser Wrote:
Peter Lemkin Wrote:
Harry Dean Wrote:Just now noticed, an 1975 book by Hugh McDonald "Appointment In Dallas" suggesting
the JFK Assassination hinged on the so called Mystery Man in Mexico City 1963 and
named Harry Dean as that person. McDonald was a book writer, LA Co. Cop and loco.


Harry, you don't look anything like the 'mystery man' seen in M.C. at the embassy, but may I ask [feel free to reply publicly or to me privately if you prefer] were you in M.C. anytime in 1963, and if so, did you stay at or pass through the Luma? And if so, did you talk to the waiter/bartender or the manager [or Buick] - or know anything about them from other sources? It is something I'm working on now, so anything would help. PM me if you'd rather not put it here publicly. Thanks much.

IDK.... Peter, I've seen Mr. Dean's earlier photo, and if Harry didn't have more curly hair then "our Man in Mexi" I would swar he looked just like him, unfortunately, it was Richard Poyle, I don't understand how many times I have to tell you people and why you can't understand!

There is no supporting evidence for Richard Poyle being in MExico City on Oct 2, 4 and 15 when the Mystery Man photos were taken... He arrived in Monterrey after Oct 17th...

Whether he was at the embassy in Mexico on Nov 21 and 22... Proof will easily settle the question.

So far this remains one of the only docs containing the name POYLE... and it talks of "standing by to meet POYLE" LIFIRE as I posted, was the follow and watch group the LI program
So far we can get POYLE to Monterrey... MEXI is not Mexico City but just the country.

Look at the bottom note: "POYLE SHOULD BE SENT...." Future tense.

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=9331&stc=1]


David, I have sense respected your work, I'm not sure what has happened to you since then, well, since I thought I respected it. Do you honestly believe ANY three letter agency is going to report on the person or persons involved? How much information have they put out there to have traveled down each and every rabbit hole that they don't give you the full story, tell me David, why after 41 years of my father's murder is my father's files still confidential that only the president of the United States can release? I thought I had a shot with Trump in office to help me get the rest of my file, but now, I really know who's calling the shots, no pun intended, oh what the hell yes it was....
Reply
#16
David, do you see the word [PRIOR] meaning BEFORE the 17th of October 1963. Do you see Poyle's name blacked out of the page, why did they black out Poyle's name on the same page they mention him AFTER October 17th?

Please, please, PLEASE SEE THAT I'M TRYING TO HELP YOU ALL!!! And, if you think I'm not helping you want me to shut up and leave then just say so and I will. Forget my ego, I don't give a shit about that, this is about my father, and the information he, and ONLY he left me with, I don't give a crap whether you believe me or not, the fact is I can prove it, but I'm tried of issuing documents and saying what I have to say and NO ONE respects my father for what he's done, even if he did pull the trigger, you don't understand! Someone had to do it, after all, though Jack was a good president, people are people, I don't care what race you are, just look at the BS going on today with the "Dreamers" really, it's no different today then 50 years ago.
Reply
#17
Peter! I'll even go a step further for ya! Customs "possibly" met with Poyle [PRIOR] to the 17th of October 1963 in Mexico, and my father is the ONLY known person who worked with Poyle and stole index cards from Customs, he would later then approach Poyle why??? I really don't have to tell you do I?

But! It wasn't "possible" they met...
Reply
#18
People may be wondering how it's POYLE's name in the blacked out box? As I've said, these documents DO NOT get analyzed by me but by a professional who has read and written these documents before. take a look at the word MEET exactly above the blacked out box, every letter that is above the letter's below will match up identically, MEET has four letters, POYLE has five, the box is extended to cover the fifth letter, they don't want you to know Poyle was there earlier, BEFORE the 17th of October 1963 WHY????

I'VE ALREADY TOLD YOU! And, this information came from my Miami sources! This document that I thought you'd never find is ONLY a partial! I've said what I had to say, and soon, you fools who doubted me for years, NOT everyone Peter will soon see I've been telling the truth!
Reply
#19
A better way explained to me was PRESENT at the top and CONTACT at the bottom same number of lettering, AND! They line up! That is POYLE whose name is missing from that box PRIOR to October 17th 1963, can anyone tell me why they blacked out his name?
Reply
#20
DOCUMENT = SECRET!

DO NOT REPRODUCE!

But! Someone did, and NOW this IS a leaked document.... ISN'T IT?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)