Harris Won - Trump Lost! The Election was Electronically Manipulated!!

[Peter Lemkin]

https://thecommoncoalition.com/wp-conten....14_NM.pdf

Chances of the actual count happening as it did is 1/1 x 10 -88!! (i.e., impossible!! greater chance a broken wine glass would spontaneously reassemble itself into an unbroken one on the table it fell off of)

We know how they did it too. Of course this is being suppressed. But remember before the election when Trump said 'we don't need your votes, we have enough' - its because he knew the software sold to most of the machines could be manipulated and most of the software and machines were owned and built by companies friendly to the Right-wing Technofascists connected to Trump-Musk-Thiel, et al!

This Will Hold   =======>  GO HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION <=======
She Won. They Didn't Just Change the Machines. 
They Rewired the Election.
How Leonard Leo's 2021 sale of an electronics firm enabled tech giants to subvert the 2024 election.
https://electiontruthalliance.org/  =======>  GO HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION <=======
This Will Hold  =======>  GO HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION <=======
Jun 11, 2025

---

The Dark Enlightenment Coup
The missing votes uncovered in Smart Elections’ legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the iceberg—an iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas.
On Monday, an investigator’s story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.
These changes were labeled “de minimis”—a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.

That revelation is a shock to the public.
But for those who’ve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn’t the headline—it’s the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain—between tech giants and Donald Trump.
And it started with a long forgotten sale.

A Power Cord Becomes a Backdoor
In March 2021, Leonard Leo—the judicial kingmaker behind the modern conservative legal machine—sold a quiet Chicago company by the name of Tripp Lite for $1.65 billion. The buyer: Eaton Corporation, a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to have a partnership with Peter Thiel’s Palantir.

To most, Tripp Lite was just a hardware brand—battery backups, surge protectors, power strips. But in America’s elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely.
They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers across the country. And they aren’t dumb devices. They are smart UPS units—programmable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with the election system via USB, serial port, or Ethernet.
ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.
If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment—without ever modifying certified election software.
In Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as “optional”—meaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight. Optional means unregulated. Unregulated means invisible. And invisible means perfect for infiltration.

[/url]
A New Purpose for the Partnership
After the Tripp Lite acquisition, Eaton stayed under the radar. But in May 2024, it resurfaced with an announcement that escaped most headlines: Eaton was deepening its partnership with Palantir Technologies.

Let’s be clear, Palantir wasn’t brought in for customer service. It was brought in to do what it does best: manage, shape, and secure vast streams of data—quietly. According to Eaton’s own release, Palantir’s role would include:
- AI-driven oversight of connected infrastructure
- Automated analysis of large datasets
- And—most critically—“secure erasure of digital footprints”

The Digital Janitor: also known as forensic sanitization, it was now being embedded into Eaton-managed hardware connected directly to voting systems. Palantir didn’t change the votes. It helped ensure you’d never prove it if someone else did.


BallotProof: The Front-End for Scrubbing Democracy
Enter the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. Co-created by Ethan Shaotran, a longtime employee of Elon Musk and current DOGE employee, BallotProof was pitched as a transparency solution—an app to “verify” scanned ballot images and support election integrity.
With Palantir's AI controlling the backend, and BallotProof cleaning the front, only one thing was missing: the signal to go live.
September 2024: Eaton and Musk Make It Official
Then came the final public breadcrumb:
In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk.
The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on “grid resilience” and “next-generation communications.”
But buried in the partnership documents was this line:

“Exploring integration with Starlink's emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.”

The Activation: Starlink Goes Direct-to-Cell
That signal came on October 30, 2024—just days before the election, Musk activated 265 brand new low Earth orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network.

DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.

From that moment on:
- Commands could be sent from orbit
- Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
- Compromised devices could be triggered remotely
This groundbreaking project that should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months.
Elon Musk boasts endlessly about everything he’s launching, building, buying—or even just thinking about—whether it’s real or not. But he pulls off one of the largest and fastest technological feats in modern day history… and says nothing? One might think that was kind of… “weird.”


Lasers From Space
According to New York Times reporting, on October 5—just before Starlink’s DTC activation—Musk texted a confidant:

“I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.”
Then, an hour later:
“This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.”

It read like a riddle. In hindsight, it was a blueprint.
Let’s review what was in place:


This wasn’t a theory. It was a full-scale operation. A systemic digital occupation—clean, credentialed, and remote-controlled.




The Outcome
Data that makes no statistical sense. A clean sweep in all seven swing states.
The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped red—not one flipped blue.
Every victory landed just under the threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Donald Trump outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seen—while Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas.
If one were to accept these results at face value—Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan. According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance:

“These anomalies didn’t happen nationwide. They didn’t even happen across all voting methods—this just doesn’t reflect human voting behavior.”

They were concentrated.
Targeted.
Specific to swing states and Texas—and specific to Election Day voting.
And the supposed explanation? “Her policies were unpopular.”
Let’s think this through logically. We’re supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris’s platform that they voted blue down ballot—but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket?
Not in early voting.
Not by mail.
With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day.
And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been cast—where VP Harris’s numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trump’s suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, “C’mon, man.”
In the world of election data analysis, there’s a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm.


Billionaires and Tech Giants Pulled Off the Crime of the Century
Why? There wasn’t just one reason—there were many.
Elon Musk himself hinted at the stakes: he faced the real possibility of a prison sentence if Trump lost. He launched his bid for Twitter—at $20 billion over market value—just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. But when the ROI is $15 trillion in mineral rights tied to Ukraine losing the war and geopolitical deals Trump could green light, it wasn’t a loss—it was leverage.
It’s no secret Musk was in communication with Putin for over two years. He even granted Starlink access to Russian forces. That’s not just profiteering. That’s treason.
Then there’s Peter Thiel and the so-called “broligarchs”—tech billionaires who worship at the altar of shower-avoidant blogger Curtis Yarvin. They casually joke about “humane genocide for non-producers” and have long viewed democracy as a nuisance—an obstacle to their vision of hypercapitalism and themselves as the permanent ruling elite.
Well, what is the elimination of Medicaid if not “humane genocide”—and does anyone really wonder why his 40-year-old protégé and political rookie, JD Vance, is Vice President? With this technology in place, if the third-term legislation were to pass, it would hand Vance a minimum of twelve years at the helm of Thiel’s regime.
And of course, Donald Trump himself:
He spent a year telling his followers he didn’t need their votes—at one point stating,

“...in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote.”

Trump was facing eighty-eight felony indictments—he was desperate to avoid conviction and locked in a decades-long alliance with Vladimir Putin. An alliance that’s now impossible to ignore—look no further than his policy trail.
He froze aid to Ukraine and has threatened to place sanctions on them, while planning to lift sanctions off Russia. He openly campaigned for anti-EU candidates, and sided with Russia in multiple key United Nations votes related to the Ukraine conflict.
Let’s be clear:
Donald Trump pledges allegiance to a red, white, and blue flag—
It’s just not the American one.
What Happens Now?
We don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We need courage. While state attorneys general begin their investigations, it only takes one U.S. senator to initiate the disqualification proceedings against the unelected and unfit occupant of the Oval Office.
Action Item:
The ETA has confirmed at least 111,000 malevolent anomalies in Pennsylvania’s 2024 election data. Sign the petition demanding a hand-count audit.
State Attorneys General and Investigators:
- Conduct independent audits of UPS firmware on Dominion and ES&S machines
- Subpoena communications between Eaton, Palantir, Starlink employees, and Pro V&V
- Audit Starlink satellite logs for the week of the election
- Freeze uncertified infrastructure updates
- Recount physical ballots—by hand
Now they’re rolling out the same technological toolkit abroad—forcing countries into Starlink contracts in exchange for tariff relief.
The U.S. election wasn’t their endgame. It was their litmus test.


Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read [url=https://thecommoncoalition.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/TheCommonCoalitionReport_5.14_NM.pdf]The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—support our all volunteer team here.

[Peter Lemkin]

YOU CAN FIND DETAILS ON SUBSTACK.COM UNDER NAME "THIS WILL HOLD". 

TIME FOR A LITTLE REVOLUTION TO TAKE BACK OUR NATION! 

JUST AS WAS PROVEN IN ROCKLAND Co., NY - THE SAME THING HAPPENED NATIONWIDE - FOR THE SAME REASON - BECAUSE OF THE SAME SOFTWARE AND SECRET PLANS!!!

IT IS BEING SUPPRESSED ON THE INTERNET SEARCH ENGINES IF YOU TRY TO LOOK ANY OF THIS UP!

[Peter Lemkin]

We heard Donald Trump thank Elon Musk for his “vote-counting computers.”
We heard him say multiple times in 2024 that he didn’t need votes.
We read Musk’s statement, that Trump would’ve lost without his help—and specifically how the House and Senate numbers would look otherwise.
And we read Musk’s own words, as reported in The New York Times, in a text on October 5—just before Starlink’s Direct-to-Cell activation:

“I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.”

Then, just an hour later:

“This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.”

This isn’t normal. It isn’t legal. And it certainly isn’t democracy.

[/url]
A Plea—and a Plan

We know the 2024 election was stolen—and it’s not just a gut feeling or a hunch. We have statistically indefensible data out of the swing states and Texas.
In Pennsylvania alone, Dr. Walter Mebane, Jr., identified 225,000 anomalous ballots—of which 111,088 were classified with high confidence as intentional, malevolent manipulations.
This isn’t speculation. It’s math. It’s forensic. And it’s urgent. We need help spreading the message.
That’s why this moment matters so deeply. Rosie O’Donnell and Stephen Colbert are using their platforms to help inform the American people—and we need them to keep going. More than that, we need others to stand with them.
To keep asking questions—loudly, publicly, fearlessly. Because millions still don’t know the election was stolen. And they need to know.
A stolen election is a rebellion against the Constitution.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is the remedy—we have grounds to remove this entire illegitimate administration. But the people won’t rise up to demand action if they don’t know the truth about November 5th.


Certification Chaos & Systemic Capture

Trump is now demanding access to voting equipment in nine states for so-called “inspection” purposes. If this feels like déjà vu, it should.
As previously covered, one of the greatest ongoing threats to election integrity is the illegal breach—and unauthorized copying of election software—by Trump’s allies in 2020–2021.
But the danger doesn’t end there—it also lies in who is allowed to certify that compromised equipment. Pro V&V, the lab responsible for certifying approximately 70% of the nation’s election systems, has a documented history of glaring oversight failures.
To make matters worse, Pro V&V is the reincarnation of CIBER, a former VSTL terminated for similar unethical practices. After losing its EAC accreditation, the same actors behind CIBER quietly resurfaced as Pro V&V—new name, same game.

• Their federal accreditation lapsed from February 2017 to February 2021—yet they continued certifying systems through the 2018 midterms, the 2020 presidential election, and into 2021.
  
• Recent public records reveal that the EAC uploaded a falsified, unsigned, and unauthenticated accreditation letter for Pro V&V—complete with official metadata—falsely implying valid federal authorization. If a private citizen forged a federal document, it would be a felony. But for Pro V&V and the EAC? Just business as usual.
  
• Weeks before the 2024 election, Pro V&V quietly removed a critical integrity check—ECO 1188—under a de minimis loophole. No public notice. No federal review. The change eliminated the configuration.ini file and disabled a key security safeguard, opening a back door to remote-access vulnerabilities in tabulation systems. In effect, it could have enabled Musk’s “lasers from space” scenario.
  
• Specific voting equipment was never tested or properly certified in at least one Pennsylvania county, ES&S was made aware of this oversight—and yet it was falsely approved by Maryann Dillon, the now-retired Director of Elections in Cambria County.
  

But there’s more—as detailed in court records and confirmed in the Patrick Christmas report—Pro V&V is deeply entangled with Dominion Voting Systems:

• Accepting undisclosed payments from Dominion
  
• Sharing office space in a building owned by a Pro V&V principal
  
• Hosting Dominion employees on-site, with physical access to election equipment
  
• Leasing space to Dominion under a confidential agreement through Pro Cog LLC—a company owned by Pro V&V’s principals (never publicly disclosed)
  

This is not independence. This is regulatory capture.
Bottom line: We cannot trust the certification process, and we cannot trust the EAC. The voting equipment is compromised—and the manipulated data makes that unmistakably clear.


We have the data. And if the data is not enough—then what decides? The ballots. The paper. The people.
We know who and what we voted for—and we must refuse to accept anything less. “The timeline to challenge has passed” is not an excuse; it’s a shield for corruption.
And this isn’t just about us. The entire world is in harm’s way, and global democracy is under threat—because our legislators refuse to act.
Being forced to accept an unelected candidate and an illegitimate administration is the antithesis of representative democracy.
We are not being governed. We are being ruled.
Then, as we’ve said from the beginning: the voting equipment—the very systems that were breached, exploited, and manipulated to produce this false outcome—must be scrapped. Entirely.
Taking Action

What YOU can do—circulate this Substack series to everyone, ask them to do the same. For now, We the People are functioning as the media.
You can: email, call, and tag the media and influencers—local, international, all of them. Share and post this Substack. Don’t let them continue to ignore the data that’s blatantly in front of us.
You can: Fund the Election Truth Alliance’s lawsuit in Pennsylvania—to get to the bottom of 225,000 anomalous ballots, including the 111,088 intentional, malevolent manipulations.
You can: Fund The Common Coalition campaign—to continue their critical investigations, data analysis, and public education efforts on the 2024 election. Click here to donate.
You can: call, email, and tag state attorneys general and members of Congress on social media. They don’t have to be your own. It only takes one to step up and get this process moving. Remind them: They work for us.
Hold on to your hope. Because again—we don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We just need courage.


Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read [url=https://thecommoncoalition.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/TheCommonCoalitionReport_5.14_NM.pdf]The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—support our all-volunteer team here.

[Peter Lemkin]

“In December 2024, I was personally involved in an NSA‑authorized forensic audit of the 2024 election. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz won—by a wide margin. Trump lost dramatically. There are multiple layers of complexity to this cover‑up, including transnational organized crime syndicates that extend far beyond the United States and our elections. To that point, I work in the human trafficking sector, which intersects with the stolen election(s) and has ties to Trump and Epstein—not to President Biden, Vice President Harris, or Governor Walz, but to the Democrats and other allied interests responsible for burying the audit.” — Adam Zarnowski, ex-CIA agent and author of Jörmungandr

[Peter Lemkin]

[Peter Lemkin]

[Peter Lemkin]