Flying object on 911

[Charles Drago]

I feel rather strongly that this should be actively combatted (at this stage anyway), if only because I smell a distant whiff of psyops in action. I cannot help but wonder if this is a designedly deflective activity. The pressure building about US/Israeli complicity in 911 is increasing by the day. The media can, if they wish to, use this UFO story to further discredit genuine and continuing investigation into the deep events of 911 and this will consequently have a considerable impact amongst the great unwashed public.[/COLOR]

[/QUOTE]

Precisely.

Think the Marilyn Monroe/UFO business (JFK assassination) and Jackie Gleason/Nixon/UFO "visit" (Watergate) to understand how this phenomenon is utilized to distract and and ultimately demonize.

Count on the fact that UFOs at the WTC on 9-11, like the "space beams" hypotheses, will be cited by the MSM and their masters as evidence of nothing other than "truther" lunacy from now until the next major flexing of deep political muscle.

Those who do not learn from history ...

[Jack White]

I feel rather strongly that this should be actively combatted (at this stage anyway), if only because I smell a distant whiff of psyops in action. I cannot help but wonder if this is a designedly deflective activity. The pressure building about US/Israeli complicity in 911 is increasing by the day. The media can, if they wish to, use this UFO story to further discredit genuine and continuing investigation into the deep events of 911 and this will consequently have a considerable impact amongst the great unwashed public.[/COLOR]

Precisely.

Think the Marilyn Monroe/UFO business (JFK assassination) and Jackie Gleason/Nixon/UFO "visit" (Watergate) to understand how this phenomenon is utilized to distract and and ultimately demonize.

Count on the fact that UFOs at the WTC on 9-11, like the "space beams" hypotheses, will be cited by the MSM and their masters as evidence of nothing other than "truther" lunacy from now until the next major flexing of deep political muscle.

Those who do not learn from history ...[/QUOTE]

I disagree. As a psyop it would have been MORE OBVIOUS. It
took 8 years before I noticed it. Everyone thought it was a bird.
A psyop would have been more like a man with an umbrella
pumping it up and down. A blurry streak seems unlikely.

Jack

[Steve Franklin]

I feel rather strongly that this should be actively combatted (at this stage anyway), if only because I smell a distant whiff of psyops in action. I cannot help but wonder if this is a designedly deflective activity. The pressure building about US/Israeli complicity in 911 is increasing by the day. The media can, if they wish to, use this UFO story to further discredit genuine and continuing investigation into the deep events of 911 and this will consequently have a considerable impact amongst the great unwashed public.[/COLOR]

Precisely.

Think the Marilyn Monroe/UFO business (JFK assassination) and Jackie Gleason/Nixon/UFO "visit" (Watergate) to understand how this phenomenon is utilized to distract and and ultimately demonize.

Count on the fact that UFOs at the WTC on 9-11, like the "space beams" hypotheses, will be cited by the MSM and their masters as evidence of nothing other than "truther" lunacy from now until the next major flexing of deep political muscle.

Those who do not learn from history ...[/QUOTE]

This really doesn't do much to answer the question, What is in the photographs? Are we really to avoid investigating certain avenues because the established "church" thinks it's silly?

[Charles Drago]

This really doesn't do much to answer the question, What is in the photographs? Are we really to avoid investigating certain avenues because the established "church" thinks it's silly?

This response tells us more about your inability to recognize answers than my ability to provide them.

You do, however, seem skilled in perceiving phantasms.

"Church"???

Someone is suggesting that you "avoid investigating certain avenues"???

Your deep political vision is, at best, myopic. But by all means continue to share what it reveals.

[David Guyatt]

The timing issue can be completely explained (as I did earlier) by the current head of steam building up against those responsible for aiding/allowing 911 to take place and then subsequently covering it up.

Indeed, that explanation is most likely imo. I repeat, imo.

***

Feel free to investigate away. Please. But be aware that unsubstantiated claims will receive objective criticism for the reasons already cited.

Speaking personally I would prefer you to investigate all matters in detail and then present the evidence rather than indulge in name calling.

On this forum we have a policy whereby we agree to disagree in a civilized way - and do not sling names at each other. However, if you feel compelled to do this we can direct you to other forums that specifically cater to this proclivity.

David

[Jack White]

All this is irrelevant to identifying what the object is
in the frames of the video. I do not know nor even
guess what it may be. It may be a sophisticated military
UAV. Its size is rather small, but it IS disk shaped with
five lights around the rim. It is some kind of object
flying thru the air. It is unidentified. Instead of dismissing
it, it should be investigated.

Jack

[Ed Jewett]

A couple of random thoughts:

There's been a long history of black technologies in the US toolkit. Putting out the word that your side has one has been a trick of military deception for millennia. Using something of that nature, whether real or not, as a secondary psy-op tool, becomes useful.

Some of those technologies have come out of Area 51 and whatever the US has gleaned, from whatever source, about high-speed flight, 'stealth' flight, composite materials, etc., it is suggested that it comes in part from its hidden files about aliens from some distant star system. All of this in Paragraph #2 also fuels what is in Paragraph #1.

It has been suggested -- in re: 9/11 -- that keeping people's attention on what is up there prevents them from focusing on what is down there. This also goes toward Paragraphs #2 and #1.

Speculation (absent fact and strict examination) doesn't get us anywhere.
Keep things factual and evidence-based.

We have seen many examples where "the pool of available information and evidence" has been poisoned or polluted.

Let whatever analysis is ongoing continue within some simple sense of priority or specialty for it.

Some extensive system of taxonomy and Learning Environment Organizer or concept map can bring us back to the question accurately and coherently when and if necessary.