Paying for Murdoch's propaganda

[Jan Klimkowski]

Rupert Murdoch plans charge for all news websites by next summer

Times and Sun readers to pay as loss-making Murdoch declares end to free-for-all

Andrew Clark in New York The Guardian, Thursday 6 August 2009 Article

Rupert Murdoch said quality journalism is not cheap and so he intends to charge for all his websites.

The billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch suffered the indignity of seeing his global empire make a huge financial loss yesterday and promptly pledged to shake up the newspaper industry by introducing charges for access to all his news websites, including the Times, the Sun and the News of the World, by next summer.

Stung by a collapse in advertising revenue as the recession shredded Fleet Street's traditional business model, Murdoch declared that the era of a free-for-all in online news was over.

"Quality journalism is not cheap," said Murdoch. "The digital revolution has opened many new and inexpensive distribution channels but it has not made content free. We intend to charge for all our news websites."

The Australian-born press and television baron was speaking as his News Corporation holding company slumped to a $3.4bn (£2bn) net loss for the financial year to June, hit by huge writedowns in the value of its assets, restructuring charges and a dive in commercial revenue.

Murdoch's newspaper holdings span the globe, from the Australian to the Wall Street Journal and to his News International stable in London.

At present, only the Wall Street Journal charges a fee for online access and until recently, received wisdom in the publishing industry was that readers would not pay to read newspapers on the internet.

Murdoch said he had completed a review of the possibility of charging and that he was willing to take the risk of leading the industry towards a pay-per-view model: "I believe that if we're successful, we'll be followed fast by other media."

He said he was thinking in terms of "this fiscal year" to introduce charges. He said News Corp would avoid a migration of readers to free sites by "making our content better and differentiated from other people".

The charging model will be extended to red-top tabloids such as the Sun and the News of the World. Murdoch said he was keen to capitalise on the popularity of celebrity stories: "When we have a celebrity scoop, the number of hits we get now are astronomical."

He accepted that there could be a need for furious litigation to prevent stories and photographs being copied elsewhere: "We'll be asserting our copyright at every point."Among quality newspapers, Murdoch singled out the Daily Telegraph's run of stories about MPs' expenses as an example of news for which consumers would be willing to pay, describing it as a "great scoop": "I'm sure people would be very happy to pay for that."

Murdoch said change was inevitable: "We're certainly satisfied that we can produce significant revenues from the sale of digital delivery of newspaper content."

Murdoch's British newspaperssuffered a 14% drop in year-end advertising revenue as the recession took its toll. Profits across News Corp's global newspaper division fell from $786m to $466m.

Elsewhere, Murdoch's empire was hit by huge reorganisation costs and write-downs at its interactive media division, which includes the social networking website MySpace.

News Corp's Twentieth Century Fox film studio recorded annual profits of $848m, a drop from last year's $1.24bn, as films such as X-Men Origins: Wolverine and the second instalment of the Night at the Museum series failed to match releases such as The Simpsons Movie and Live Free or Die Hard a year ago.

Earnings from cable networks rose by 31% to $1.67bn but the group's television division, including its Fox stations in the US and Star networks in Asia, saw profits fall from $1.12bn to $174m.

"The past year has been the most difficult in recent history, and our 2009 financial performance clearly reflects the weak economic environment that we confronted throughout the year," said Murdoch.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug...te-charges

[Jan Klimkowski]

Rupert Murdoch said quality journalism is not cheap

Oh the irony.

He accepted that there could be a need for furious litigation to prevent stories and photographs being copied elsewhere: "We'll be asserting our copyright at every point."

It's possible to copyright pornography and disinformation?

Wow. I learn something new from the Dirty Digger every day.

I wondered where to put this thread, and decided "Propaganda" was the appropriate folder for the godfather of Faux News.

[Magda Hassan]

Well, the company is not called News LIMITED for nothing.

[Mark Stapleton]

Calling Murdoch the dirty digger is a bit misleading. While he loves war (well there's so much money in it), he would never become a participant himself. He leaves that to others.

Pay money to read journalists reflect Murdoch's extremely sick view of the world? Don't think so.

I can get the sport and weather elsewhere.

[Peter Lemkin]

Maybe one of the more stock-market saavy here can invent futures in Propaganda and we can all get rich, as there will be a boom market, I'm sure!

[Jan Klimkowski]

Calling Murdoch the dirty digger is a bit misleading. While he loves war (well there's so much money in it), he would never become a participant himself. He leaves that to others.

I agree. It's also arguably a slur on Australians.

However, the phrase originated with the English satirical magazine, Private Eye, because, after buying The Sun, central to Murdoch's strategy to sell newspapers to working class Brits was putting photographs of topless women on Page 3.

Murdoch told the staff that he wanted the Sun to focus on ‘sex, sports and contests’, a mission translated in the satirical paper Private Eye as ‘a tear away appear with a lot of tit’. Private Eye labeled Murdoch ‘the Dirty Digger’, well before the paper’s launch in 1970 of a regular feature, which continues to this day: a photograph of a naked woman on page three. As recently as October 2002, the Sun was congratulating itself on the emergence of a Sun-look alike in Moscow (dubbed inevitably, the Sun-ski) complete with page three ‘lovelies’. The Sun’s page three girl has also made a successful move to the paper’s website.

http://runningbetweenthewickets.blogspot...-nick.html

[Mark Stapleton]

Calling Murdoch the dirty digger is a bit misleading. While he loves war (well there's so much money in it), he would never become a participant himself. He leaves that to others.

I agree. It's also arguably a slur on Australians.

However, the phrase originated with the English satirical magazine, Private Eye, because, after buying The Sun, central to Murdoch's strategy to sell newspapers to working class Brits was putting photographs of topless women on Page 3.

Murdoch told the staff that he wanted the Sun to focus on ‘sex, sports and contests’, a mission translated in the satirical paper Private Eye as ‘a tear away appear with a lot of tit’. Private Eye labeled Murdoch ‘the Dirty Digger’, well before the paper’s launch in 1970 of a regular feature, which continues to this day: a photograph of a naked woman on page three. As recently as October 2002, the Sun was congratulating itself on the emergence of a Sun-look alike in Moscow (dubbed inevitably, the Sun-ski) complete with page three ‘lovelies’. The Sun’s page three girl has also made a successful move to the paper’s website.

http://runningbetweenthewickets.blogspot...-nick.html

Interesting. Murdoch had a similar strategy here. I remember when the Murdoch's Daily Mirror, a Sydney newspaper, had the page 3 girl as a regular feature. It lasted through to the mid 1980's I think.

He'll leave a legacy of editorial interference, dubious political alliances, advocacy of war, tax avoidance and tits.

[Jack White]

Remember that Murdoch (who hides that he is half Jewish) came to
power as a CIA asset during the Nugan Hand Bank scandal.

Jack

[Charles Drago]

"Murdoch told the staff that he wanted the Sun to focus on ‘sex, sports and contests.'" [emphasis added]

America's commercial television networks -- broadcast and cable -- are now all but inundated by "American Idol"-like competitions.

Or, as Murdoch would have it, "contests."

I include in this category the "Real Housewives" series that dominates cable's Bravo channel -- originally offered as a PBS-like home for independent and classic films and other fine and performing arts programming, now reduced to catfights and caterwauling.

[Memo to my agent: "The Real Housewives of the Warsaw Ghetto" -- Watch as five jaunty Jewess jigglers fight tooth and nail over who makes the best rat-tatouie, who's been sleeping with Fritz the sentry, and who gets to keep their children alive." Appointment TV -- in the bunker that is the American heartland.]

"Contests" are all about picking sides and obliterating the competition, amassing toys and other trophies, and abandoning all scruples in the mad race to acquire.

"Contests" are all about differentiating between "them" and "us," and demonizing "them."

Consumerism does what its name tells us it does.

It consumes.

Everything and everyone.

[Mark Stapleton]

Consumerism does what its name tells us it does.

It consumes.

Everything and everyone.

I agree fully, CD. It's consumed the minds of the current generation. I'm sad for them.