Who killed Ron and Nicole?

[Jack White]

Donald Freed's Killing Time: The First Full Investigation into the Unsolved Murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has made the best case to date.

Freed, of course, wrote Executive Action and Death in Washington: The murder of Orlando Letelier , both of which belong on your "Must Read" lists.

Sorry, Charles. THIS DOCUMENTARY makes the best case.
Lots of new evidence. Three Jason diaries in which he "confesses".
New witnesses...a forged alibi time card...new photos with evidence...
and the actual murder weapon.

Watch it.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...6122795&hl

Jack

Some who promised to watch this video have not yet done so.

[Magda Hassan]

I've watched it Jack. It is quite a convincing case he puts forward there. I was an OJ did it believer before but not now. It is a shame though he has had no interest from the legal system there. Like the Justice Dept with JFK. They've gone through the machinations of an investigation and trial and that's that. End of story for them.

[Jack White]

I've watched it Jack. It is quite a convincing case he puts forward there. I was an OJ did it believer before but not now. It is a shame though he has had no interest from the legal system there. Like the Justice Dept with JFK. They've gone through the machinations of an investigation and trial and that's that. End of story for them.

An important facet is that Jason has not brought any
legal action against Bill Dear, which he certainly would
if innocent.

Thanks for you comment about the importance of Dear's
documentary. I am disappointed that many are afraid to
look at it lest it change their prior opinion.

Jack

[Myra Bronstein]

...
Thanks, Dawn, for watching this compelling video.
You are interested in justice.

Others here must not be interested in justice, since
they refuse to watch Dear's presentation of new
evidence about the real killer. They give lip service
to justice, but are victims of their own preconceptions
and biases. "OJ did it, let him rot in jail".

I lose respect for any and all who REFUSE to look at
evidence which dispels mystery and exposes truth.
...
Jack

Jack you're overreaching in concluding that anyone who opts not to watch that hour plus video is not interested in justice. Maybe people prefer to focus instead on big picture crimes that changed the course of the world, like the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassinations. We all pick our battle and there is no shortage.

[Myra Bronstein]

Ok well I got so curious that I had to watch the video and it's completely convincing. Furthermore Dear absolutely does give a clear motive--that Nicole and family did not come eat at his restaurant as planned and Jason was hurt and disappointed. Give that he was off the meds he took to control his rage that is enough of a trigger.

And I must correct myself that this is not a big picture crime. The big picture, while not a deep political one, is that the LAPD does not care about finding real killers and correcting past mistakes. And I'm sure the LAPD is not atypical among police forces.

Thanks for sharing that video with us Jack. Dear seems utterly credible. I especially appreciate the fact that he said he tried to share the evidence he uncovered with the LAPD and they blew him off. It was only after that that he wrote his book to spread the word about his findings. In fact he's giving away his findings in the video. It's not a tease to promote the book. He lays it all out there. So profit from the book does not seem like his primary goal. Sharing his evidence and conclusions is the goal.

OJ Simpson innocent. Whooda thunk it?

And good for the jury who acquitted him. Never thought I'd say that.

[Myra Bronstein]

Overwhelmingly positive reviews of Dear's book at Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/J-Guilty-But-Not-M...ewpoints=1

[Jack White]

Ok well I got so curious that I had to watch the video and it's completely convincing. Furthermore Dear absolutely does give a clear motive--that Nicole and family did not come eat at his restaurant as planned and Jason was hurt and disappointed. Give that he was off the meds he took to control his rage that is enough of a trigger.

And I must correct myself that this is not a big picture crime. The big picture, while not a deep political one, is that the LAPD does not care about finding real killers and correcting past mistakes. And I'm sure the LAPD is not atypical among police forces.

Thanks for sharing that video with us Jack. Dear seems utterly credible. I especially appreciate the fact that he said he tried to share the evidence he uncovered with the LAPD and they blew him off. It was only after that that he wrote his book to spread the word about his findings. In fact he's giving away his findings in the video. It's not a tease to promote the book. He lays it all out there. So profit from the book does not seem like his primary goal. Sharing his evidence and conclusions is the goal.

OJ Simpson innocent. Whooda thunk it?

And good for the jury who acquitted him. Never thought I'd say that.

Thanks, Myra, for sharing your opinion.

Injustice is everywhere, and all all corruption that allows it
ought to be exposed. The system that allows this is at fault.
It really makes little difference whether it is LHO or OJ who
is falsely accused. That both were made patsies is what
ultimately matters.

OJ was guilty of something most parents might do...covering
up to save his son. That is wrong, and is a crime, but is
understandable.

Jack

PS...Dear spent 12 years investigating the case spending his
own money to develop evidence. He clearly was interested in
truth, not profits.

[Jack White]

Jim Fetzer watched the OJ documentary last weekend.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...122795&hl#

I hope he will post his opinion here.

Thanks, Jim.

Jack

[Myra Bronstein]

Jim Fetzer watched the OJ documentary last weekend.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...122795&hl#

I hope he will post his opinion here.

Thanks, Jim.

Jack

I hope so too. I never thought I'd conclude that OJ is innocent, but Dear made his case.

[Magda Hassan]

Jim Fetzer watched the OJ documentary last weekend.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...122795&hl#

I hope he will post his opinion here.

Thanks, Jim.

Jack

I hope so too. I never thought I'd conclude that OJ is innocent, but Dear made his case.

Same for me. I was previously convinced that OJ got away with murder because of his money and lawyers. But Dear puts forth a very convincing case that it was his son. :top: