Future Demolition of World Trade Center blue prints

[Magda Hassan]

I found this post while looking for something totally unrelated but found it most interesting. I suppose it has been covered elsewhere of some of the 911 sites but this not being my area I wouldn't know. Nevertheless, it brings up some interesting scenarios for me.


Life expectancy of the WTC
Originally written in August 2006 by Michael.
When the WTC buildings were conceived and the design and construction of them began the future demolition of them would have been carefully taken into consideration and the structure of them would have been carefully mapped and marked out with positions where to place future demolition charges. I have seen this at work in the former West Germany where every vital piece of infrastructure constructed after WW2, such as roads, bridges and key buildings etc, were built with its future swift demolition in mind so as to ensure that no usable structure would be left for the ‘enemy’ to make use of as well as to slow down Soviet and Warsaw Pact land forces (the ‘cold war’ was the reason then with the possible Soviet attack considered a real threat).
No-one builds two of the largest structures in the world in one of the most densely populated business districts on the planet and neglects to take into consideration and make arrangements in the design, development and building for it’s inevitable future demolition.
The point I’m making is very simple, yet has been completely ignored, even ridiculed by some at the forefront of 9/11 research, whoever was given the contract to ensure that the buildings were designed and ‘equipped’ (and I’m not saying that the explosives were installed at that time as Hufschmid interpreted when I first presented this line of investigation to him) with their future destruction in mind would be the ones who held those plans and would be the demolition contractor from where those plans were obtained from in order that those buildings were ’set-up’ in the pre-prescribed manner so as to ensure their efficient demolition which we all witnessed on that day.
This eliminates any useless arguments and theories as to how the buildings were demolished and will conclusively prove that they were brought down with demolition charges. By examining the original “future demolition plans”, which would clearly show where future explosives would be mounted, against the video footage clearly demonstrating where explosives can be seen being detonated we would undoubtedly see that both the footage and the plans match precisely.
Someone has those plans, which would have been carefully locked away securely (especially in light of the first WTC bombing) in the contractors safe or vault and that someone would have had to have been authorized within the demolition company to access them.
http://parapolitics.info/category/fintan-dunne/

[Helen Reyes]

This, as best as I can make out, seems to be a cover story for why the WTC had to be "pulled": they posed a danger to surrounding buildings. Urban planners 1970-1974 did not include ease-of-demolition features in US skyscrapers afaik, they built them out of steel to last. Eventual deconstruction would be envisaged as construction, floor by floor. I'm not well read on this, but this is what my gut feeling tells me. I saw this new layer of the onion crop up first from the UK, perhaps MI6 is trying to tie up some loose ends for its pseudo-insider congregation by offering plausible deniability to the idea the US would bomb itself. It fails to deal with 3000+ victims, but "for the greater good" is the implied assumption I suppose. It might provide a layer of cover to the people who planted the bombs and painted the steel with thermate too, idk.

[Magda Hassan]

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence...index.html
North Tower Blueprints

World Trade Center Architectural Drawings Released by Whistleblower

In March of 2007, detailed architectural drawings for portions of the World Trade Center were sent to Steven E Jones, and subsequently published on a number of websites. 9-11 Research provides two methods for viewing the drawings:

• A user-friendly multi-resolution viewer
  
• A complete table listing
  

Captions on the drawings contain the following:
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: THE PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY
MINORU YAMASAKI & ASSOCIATES: MINORU YAMASAKI, ARCHITECT
WORTHINGTON, SKILLING, HELLE & JACKSON: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
JOSEPH R. LORING & ASSOCIATES: ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS
EMERY ROTH & SONS: RICHARD ROTH, ARCHITECT
JAROS, BAUM & BOLLES: MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
THE PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY: PAVING, UTILITIES, FOUNDATIONS
The graphic documents, numbering 261, are high-resolution scans of blueprints that include detailed floor plans and elevations of the North Tower, structural details of the hat truss and TV mast, and plans of the foundation and basement levels of the World Trade Center complex. Most of the drawings are dated August 31, 1967.
The drawings go a long way towards answering the call for release of building blueprints publicized in earlier versions of the 9-11 Research blueprints page. The drawings corroborate inferences about the core structures of the Twin Towers earlier made by 9-11 Research on the basis of construction photographs and descriptions in contemporaneous issues of the Engineering News Record.

Thanks Carsten.